TY - JOUR
T1 - A business frame perspective on why perceptions of top management's bottom-line mentality result in employees’ good and bad behaviors
AU - Babalola, Mayowa T.
AU - Greenbaum, Rebecca L.
AU - Amarnani, Rajiv K.
AU - Shoss, Mindy K.
AU - Deng, Yingli
AU - Garba, Omale A.
AU - Guo, Liang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Emerging research suggests that bottom-line mentalities (BLMs) (i.e., a sole focus on bottom-line outcomes to the exclusion of other considerations) can have dysfunctional consequences within the workplace. However, research has yet to consider how and why BLMs may result in both beneficial and dysfunctional organizational outcomes. In the present research, we examine employees’ perceptions of top management's BLM as a type of business frame that results in two cognitive states. Under the influence of this business frame, employees may adopt a mental preoccupation with work (i.e., a state of ongoing work-related cognitions) that propels beneficial employee outcomes by reducing customer incivility and enhancing customer service performance. Yet, also in response to top management's high BLM as a business frame, employees may adopt self-interest cognitions (i.e., a cognitive state of self-interest) that instigate customer-directed unethical conduct. Across two field studies, we found general support for our hypotheses. Taken together, our findings suggest that perceptions of top management's high BLM can be a mixed blessing in that it may drive employees to adopt focused work efforts (mental preoccupation with work), but also self-interest cognitions, with each cognitive state predicting beneficial or dysfunctional behaviors. We discuss the implications of these findings and directions for future research.
AB - Emerging research suggests that bottom-line mentalities (BLMs) (i.e., a sole focus on bottom-line outcomes to the exclusion of other considerations) can have dysfunctional consequences within the workplace. However, research has yet to consider how and why BLMs may result in both beneficial and dysfunctional organizational outcomes. In the present research, we examine employees’ perceptions of top management's BLM as a type of business frame that results in two cognitive states. Under the influence of this business frame, employees may adopt a mental preoccupation with work (i.e., a state of ongoing work-related cognitions) that propels beneficial employee outcomes by reducing customer incivility and enhancing customer service performance. Yet, also in response to top management's high BLM as a business frame, employees may adopt self-interest cognitions (i.e., a cognitive state of self-interest) that instigate customer-directed unethical conduct. Across two field studies, we found general support for our hypotheses. Taken together, our findings suggest that perceptions of top management's high BLM can be a mixed blessing in that it may drive employees to adopt focused work efforts (mental preoccupation with work), but also self-interest cognitions, with each cognitive state predicting beneficial or dysfunctional behaviors. We discuss the implications of these findings and directions for future research.
KW - bottom-line mentality
KW - customer-oriented outcomes
KW - mental preoccupation with work
KW - self-interest cognitions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071912473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071912473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/peps.12355
DO - 10.1111/peps.12355
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071912473
SN - 0031-5826
VL - 73
SP - 19
EP - 41
JO - Personnel Psychology
JF - Personnel Psychology
IS - 1
ER -