A case for formalizing subseries (subepochs) of the Cenozoic Era(a)

Martin J. Head, Marie Pierre Aubry, Mike Walker, Kenneth G. Miller, Brian R. Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Subseries/subepochs (e.g., Lower/Early Eocene, Upper/ Late Pleistocene) have yet to be formally defined despite their wide use in the Cenozoic literature. This has led to concerns about the stability of their definition and uncertainty over their status that has led to inconsistencies in capitalization. To address these issues, we propose for the Cenozoic that subseries/subepochs be defined formally by reference to Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points and ratified in the same way as for other formal chronostratigraphic units. Formalization of subseries/subepochs for the Cenozoic will respect their deep historical roots, recognise their chronostratigraphic nature, stabilize their definition, ensure consistency in application, embrace their de-facto use as formal terms within the Paleogene, Neogene and especially Quaternary communities, and resolve the question of capitalization: an upper-case initial letter without exception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-27
Number of pages6
JournalEpisodes
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

stratotype
Paleogene
Neogene
Eocene
Pleistocene

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Head, Martin J. ; Aubry, Marie Pierre ; Walker, Mike ; Miller, Kenneth G. ; Pratt, Brian R. / A case for formalizing subseries (subepochs) of the Cenozoic Era(a). In: Episodes. 2017 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 22-27.
@article{2490812144d640238647bff6944f469b,
title = "A case for formalizing subseries (subepochs) of the Cenozoic Era(a)",
abstract = "Subseries/subepochs (e.g., Lower/Early Eocene, Upper/ Late Pleistocene) have yet to be formally defined despite their wide use in the Cenozoic literature. This has led to concerns about the stability of their definition and uncertainty over their status that has led to inconsistencies in capitalization. To address these issues, we propose for the Cenozoic that subseries/subepochs be defined formally by reference to Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points and ratified in the same way as for other formal chronostratigraphic units. Formalization of subseries/subepochs for the Cenozoic will respect their deep historical roots, recognise their chronostratigraphic nature, stabilize their definition, ensure consistency in application, embrace their de-facto use as formal terms within the Paleogene, Neogene and especially Quaternary communities, and resolve the question of capitalization: an upper-case initial letter without exception.",
author = "Head, {Martin J.} and Aubry, {Marie Pierre} and Mike Walker and Miller, {Kenneth G.} and Pratt, {Brian R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "22--27",
journal = "Episodes",
issn = "0705-3797",
publisher = "International Union of Geological Sciences",
number = "1",

}

A case for formalizing subseries (subepochs) of the Cenozoic Era(a). / Head, Martin J.; Aubry, Marie Pierre; Walker, Mike; Miller, Kenneth G.; Pratt, Brian R.

In: Episodes, Vol. 40, No. 1, 03.2017, p. 22-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case for formalizing subseries (subepochs) of the Cenozoic Era(a)

AU - Head, Martin J.

AU - Aubry, Marie Pierre

AU - Walker, Mike

AU - Miller, Kenneth G.

AU - Pratt, Brian R.

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Subseries/subepochs (e.g., Lower/Early Eocene, Upper/ Late Pleistocene) have yet to be formally defined despite their wide use in the Cenozoic literature. This has led to concerns about the stability of their definition and uncertainty over their status that has led to inconsistencies in capitalization. To address these issues, we propose for the Cenozoic that subseries/subepochs be defined formally by reference to Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points and ratified in the same way as for other formal chronostratigraphic units. Formalization of subseries/subepochs for the Cenozoic will respect their deep historical roots, recognise their chronostratigraphic nature, stabilize their definition, ensure consistency in application, embrace their de-facto use as formal terms within the Paleogene, Neogene and especially Quaternary communities, and resolve the question of capitalization: an upper-case initial letter without exception.

AB - Subseries/subepochs (e.g., Lower/Early Eocene, Upper/ Late Pleistocene) have yet to be formally defined despite their wide use in the Cenozoic literature. This has led to concerns about the stability of their definition and uncertainty over their status that has led to inconsistencies in capitalization. To address these issues, we propose for the Cenozoic that subseries/subepochs be defined formally by reference to Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points and ratified in the same way as for other formal chronostratigraphic units. Formalization of subseries/subepochs for the Cenozoic will respect their deep historical roots, recognise their chronostratigraphic nature, stabilize their definition, ensure consistency in application, embrace their de-facto use as formal terms within the Paleogene, Neogene and especially Quaternary communities, and resolve the question of capitalization: an upper-case initial letter without exception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016255423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016255423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017004

DO - 10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016255423

VL - 40

SP - 22

EP - 27

JO - Episodes

JF - Episodes

SN - 0705-3797

IS - 1

ER -