TY - GEN
T1 - A comparative study of AODV and OLSR on the ORBIT testbed
AU - Rastogi, Devashish
AU - Ganu, Sachin
AU - Zhang, Yanyong
AU - Trappe, Wade
AU - Graff, Charles
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Though ad hoc network routing protocols, such as AODV and OLSR, have been extensively studied through simulations, there have been fewer evaluations of their software protocol implementations on real network testbed deployments. Consequently, validating the protocol functionality and performance on an actual experimental platform is imperative in order to understand relative merits or limitations under different network conditions. In this paper, we present our initial experimental evaluations of the publicly available AODV and OLSR implementations on the national Open Access Research Testbed (ORBIT) for Next Generation Wireless Networks. We focused on the implementation issues involved in porting these protocols on an open-access testbed as well as the behavior of the proctols on the tested. Finally, we also looked at maximum achievable throughput using these protocols under different settings. Our preliminary observations indicate that in a static scenario, these two protocols can achieve comparable throughput, with AODV offering better stability than OLSR.
AB - Though ad hoc network routing protocols, such as AODV and OLSR, have been extensively studied through simulations, there have been fewer evaluations of their software protocol implementations on real network testbed deployments. Consequently, validating the protocol functionality and performance on an actual experimental platform is imperative in order to understand relative merits or limitations under different network conditions. In this paper, we present our initial experimental evaluations of the publicly available AODV and OLSR implementations on the national Open Access Research Testbed (ORBIT) for Next Generation Wireless Networks. We focused on the implementation issues involved in porting these protocols on an open-access testbed as well as the behavior of the proctols on the tested. Finally, we also looked at maximum achievable throughput using these protocols under different settings. Our preliminary observations indicate that in a static scenario, these two protocols can achieve comparable throughput, with AODV offering better stability than OLSR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47949121961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47949121961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/MILCOM.2007.4455056
DO - 10.1109/MILCOM.2007.4455056
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:47949121961
SN - 1424415136
SN - 9781424415137
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE Military Communications Conference MILCOM
BT - Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2007
T2 - Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2007
Y2 - 29 October 2007 through 31 October 2007
ER -