A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations

Chunpeng Fan, Donghui Zhang, Cun Hui Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although asymptotically the sandwich covariance estimator is consistent and robust with respect to the selection of the working correlation matrix, when the sample size is small, its bias may not be negligible. This article compares the small sample corrections for the sandwich covariance estimator as well as the inferential procedures proposed by Mancl and DeRouen (2001), Kauermann and Carroll (2001), Fay and Graubard (2001), and Fan et al. (2012). Simulation studies show that when using a maximum likelihood method to estimate the covariance parameters and using the between-within method for the denominator degrees of freedom when making inference, the Kauermann and Carroll method is preferred in the investigated balanced logistic regression and the Mancl and DeRouen and Fan et al. methods are preferred in the investigated proportional odds model. A collagen-induced arthritis study is employed to demonstrate the application of the methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1172-1187
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Keywords

  • Empirical covariance estimator
  • GEE
  • Sandwich covariance estimator

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this