TY - JOUR
T1 - A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers
AU - Manne, Sharon
AU - Badr, Hoda
AU - Kashy, Deborah A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This research was supported by an Established Investigator in Cancer Prevention and Control Award to Sharon Manne by the NCI (K05 CA109008) and by a Cancer Prevention and Control Career Development Award by the NCI (K07 CA124668) to Hoda Badr.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Individuals diagnosed with lung and head and neck (HN) cancers and their spouses are at increased risk for distress. This study assessed whether the way couples communicate about cancer and their perceptions of relationship intimacy influenced both partners' adjustment. One-hundred thirty-nine patients and their spouses [For purposes of clarity, we refer to the patients' intimate partner as the spouse, regardless of actual marital status and we reserve the term partner to refer to the other person in the couple (i.e., the patient's partner is the spouse and the spouse's partner is the patient)] completed measures of spousal communication, intimacy, and distress at three time points over 6 months. Using multilevel modeling, an over-time actor-partner interdependence model was specified that examined whether intimacy mediated associations between one's own and one's partner's reports of communication at baseline and later distress. Patients and spouses who reported greater baseline distress reported more negative baseline communication as well as lower levels of intimacy and greater distress over time. Mediation analyses showed patients' and spouses' reports of positive spousal communication were associated with less subsequent distress largely through their effects on intimacy. Clinicians working with head and neck or lung cancer patients should assess communication and intimacy because both impact couples' distress.
AB - Individuals diagnosed with lung and head and neck (HN) cancers and their spouses are at increased risk for distress. This study assessed whether the way couples communicate about cancer and their perceptions of relationship intimacy influenced both partners' adjustment. One-hundred thirty-nine patients and their spouses [For purposes of clarity, we refer to the patients' intimate partner as the spouse, regardless of actual marital status and we reserve the term partner to refer to the other person in the couple (i.e., the patient's partner is the spouse and the spouse's partner is the patient)] completed measures of spousal communication, intimacy, and distress at three time points over 6 months. Using multilevel modeling, an over-time actor-partner interdependence model was specified that examined whether intimacy mediated associations between one's own and one's partner's reports of communication at baseline and later distress. Patients and spouses who reported greater baseline distress reported more negative baseline communication as well as lower levels of intimacy and greater distress over time. Mediation analyses showed patients' and spouses' reports of positive spousal communication were associated with less subsequent distress largely through their effects on intimacy. Clinicians working with head and neck or lung cancer patients should assess communication and intimacy because both impact couples' distress.
KW - Couple communication Interpersonal processes Relationship intimacy Psychological adaptation Cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863775674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863775674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10865-011-9349-1
DO - 10.1007/s10865-011-9349-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 21556790
AN - SCOPUS:84863775674
SN - 0160-7715
VL - 35
SP - 334
EP - 346
JO - Journal of behavioral medicine
JF - Journal of behavioral medicine
IS - 3
ER -