TY - JOUR
T1 - A low-calorie diet with or without interval exercise training improves adiposopathy in obese women
AU - Gilbertson, Nicole M.
AU - Eichner, Natalie Z.M.
AU - Heiston, Emily M.
AU - Gaitán, Julian M.
AU - Francois, Monique E.
AU - Mehaffey, J. Hunter
AU - Hassinger, Taryn E.
AU - Hallowell, Peter T.
AU - Weltman, Arthur
AU - Malin, Steven K.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the staff of the clinical research unit, exercise physiology core laboratory, and ligand assay core laboratory for their contributions to data collection and analysis. We would also like to thank the study participants for their excellent efforts as well as the members of the Applied Metabolism & Physiology Laboratory for helpful discussion and feedback on this manuscript. This work was supported by the University of Virginia Thelma R. Swortzel Award, the Curry School of Education, and Diabetes Action Research grant to S.K.M. S.K.M is supported by United States National Institutes of Health (RO1-HL130296).
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The objective of this study was to test if a low-calorie diet plus interval exercise (LCD+INT) improves adiposopathy, an endocrine dysfunction, when compared with an energy-deficit–matched LCD in obese women. Subjects (age: 48.2 ± 2.4 years, body mass index: 37.8 ± 1.3 kg/m2) were randomized to a 13-day LCD (n = 12; mixed meals of ∼1200 kcal/day) or LCD+INT (n = 12; 12 sessions of 60 min/day alternating 3 min at 50% and 90% peak heart rate). Exercise was estimated to expend 350 kcal per oxygen uptake–heart rate regression analysis and individuals were refed calories expended to match energy availability between groups. Absolute (post – pre caloric intake) and relative (total daily and exercise energy expenditure relative to calorie intake) energy deficits were calculated. Fitness (peak oxygen uptake) and body composition (BodPod; Cosmed USA Inc.) were measured and a 120-min, 75g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at pre-and post-intervention to assess adiposopathy (i.e., ratio of high molecular weight–adiponectin to leptin) and estimate insulin sensitivity. LCD and LCD+INT had similar absolute (P = 0.55) and relative (P = 0.76) energy deficits. LCD and LCD+INT had similar reductions in fat mass (both P < 0.001), despite LCD inducing greater weight loss (P = 0.02) than LCD+INT. Both treatments improved adiposopathy (P = 0.003) and peripheral insulin sensitivity (P = 0.02). Absolute energy deficit correlated to improved adiposopathy (r = –0.41, P = 0.05), and absolute and relative energy deficits were associated with increased insulin sensitivity (r = –0.47, P = 0.02; and r = –0.40, P = 0.05, respectively), independent of body composition changes and increased peak oxygen uptake. Taken together, LCD, with or without INT, improves adiposopathy in relation to insulin sensitivity in obese women, suggesting that a short-term energy deficit is key for reducing risk of type 2 diabetes.
AB - The objective of this study was to test if a low-calorie diet plus interval exercise (LCD+INT) improves adiposopathy, an endocrine dysfunction, when compared with an energy-deficit–matched LCD in obese women. Subjects (age: 48.2 ± 2.4 years, body mass index: 37.8 ± 1.3 kg/m2) were randomized to a 13-day LCD (n = 12; mixed meals of ∼1200 kcal/day) or LCD+INT (n = 12; 12 sessions of 60 min/day alternating 3 min at 50% and 90% peak heart rate). Exercise was estimated to expend 350 kcal per oxygen uptake–heart rate regression analysis and individuals were refed calories expended to match energy availability between groups. Absolute (post – pre caloric intake) and relative (total daily and exercise energy expenditure relative to calorie intake) energy deficits were calculated. Fitness (peak oxygen uptake) and body composition (BodPod; Cosmed USA Inc.) were measured and a 120-min, 75g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at pre-and post-intervention to assess adiposopathy (i.e., ratio of high molecular weight–adiponectin to leptin) and estimate insulin sensitivity. LCD and LCD+INT had similar absolute (P = 0.55) and relative (P = 0.76) energy deficits. LCD and LCD+INT had similar reductions in fat mass (both P < 0.001), despite LCD inducing greater weight loss (P = 0.02) than LCD+INT. Both treatments improved adiposopathy (P = 0.003) and peripheral insulin sensitivity (P = 0.02). Absolute energy deficit correlated to improved adiposopathy (r = –0.41, P = 0.05), and absolute and relative energy deficits were associated with increased insulin sensitivity (r = –0.47, P = 0.02; and r = –0.40, P = 0.05, respectively), independent of body composition changes and increased peak oxygen uptake. Taken together, LCD, with or without INT, improves adiposopathy in relation to insulin sensitivity in obese women, suggesting that a short-term energy deficit is key for reducing risk of type 2 diabetes.
KW - Adiponectin
KW - Energy availability
KW - Energy deficit
KW - Interval exercise
KW - Leptin
KW - Metabolic flexibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072716878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072716878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/apnm-2018-0717
DO - 10.1139/apnm-2018-0717
M3 - Article
C2 - 30785773
AN - SCOPUS:85072716878
SN - 1715-5312
VL - 44
SP - 1057
EP - 1064
JO - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism
JF - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism
IS - 10
ER -