A machine learning approach to identify clinical trials involving nanodrugs and nanodevices from ClinicalTrials.gov

Diana De La Iglesia, Miguel García-Remesal, Alberto Anguita, Miguel Munoz-Marmol, Casimir Kulikowski, Víctor Maojo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Clinical Trials (CTs) are essential for bridging the gap between experimental research on new drugs and their clinical application. Just like CTs for traditional drugs and biologics have helped accelerate the translation of biomedical findings into medical practice, CTs for nanodrugs and nanodevices could advance novel nanomaterials as agents for diagnosis and therapy. Although there is publicly available information about nanomedicine-related CTs, the online archiving of this information is carried out without adhering to criteria that discriminate between studies involving nanomaterials or nanotechnology-based processes (nano), and CTs that do not involve nanotechnology (non-nano). Finding out whether nanodrugs and nanodevices were involved in a study from CT summaries alone is a challenging task. At the time of writing, CTs archived in the well-known online registry ClinicalTrials.gov are not easily told apart as to whether they are nano or non-nano CTs - even when performed by domain experts, due to the lack of both a common definition for nanotechnology and of standards for reporting nanomedical experiments and results.

Methods: We propose a supervised learning approach for classifying CT summaries from ClinicalTrials.gov according to whether they fall into the nano or the non-nano categories. Our method involves several stages: i) extraction and manual annotation of CTs as nano vs. non-nano, ii) pre-processing and automatic classification, and iii) performance evaluation using several state-of-the-art classifiers under different transformations of the original dataset.

Results and Conclusions: The performance of the best automated classifier closely matches that of experts (AUC over 0.95), suggesting that it is feasible to automatically detect the presence of nanotechnology products in CT summaries with a high degree of accuracy. This can significantly speed up the process of finding whether reports on ClinicalTrials.gov might be relevant to a particular nanoparticle or nanodevice, which is essential to discover any precedents for nanotoxicity events or advantages for targeted drug therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere110331
JournalPloS one
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 27 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A machine learning approach to identify clinical trials involving nanodrugs and nanodevices from ClinicalTrials.gov'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this