TY - JOUR
T1 - A Novel Flipped Nutrition Curriculum in Physician Assistant Education
AU - Wright, Matthew
AU - O’Connell, Claire Babcock
AU - Yeh, Dipali
AU - Tomesko, Jennifer
AU - Cogan-Drew, Thea
AU - Vidal, Erich
AU - Jia, Yuane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2025 PA Education Association.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction Nutrition is essential in patient management. Physician assistant (PA) and PA students have reported low confidence in providing nutrition education. This study was designed to compare a novel flipped curriculum. Methods This was a quasi-experimental cohort comparison of examination question performance between 2 student cohorts taught in a nutrition flipped curriculum (graduation years 2023, 2024) and one cohort (graduation year 2022) taught with traditional lecture within the didactic phase of a single Mid-Atlantic PA program. Exam scores between cohorts were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and potential confounding student variables were assessed with multiple regression. Results Examination performance was similar between traditional and flipped cohorts (traditional: 2022 = 82.25 6 7.13; flipped: 2023 = 83.33 6 9.26; 2024 = 83.15 6 8.76; P = .63). The only significant covariate to predict nutrition exam question scores was PA school grade point average (b = 10.56, P <.001). Discussion Scores on nutrition examination questions were similar between flipped and traditional teaching methods, and the only predictive student factor was PA school grade point average. Future studies should explore a flipped classroom approach in developing students’ nutrition assessment skills, such as taking a nutrition history and evaluating the appropriateness of a patient’s diet. Future evaluations can also explore the student learning experience in a flipped classroom.
AB - Introduction Nutrition is essential in patient management. Physician assistant (PA) and PA students have reported low confidence in providing nutrition education. This study was designed to compare a novel flipped curriculum. Methods This was a quasi-experimental cohort comparison of examination question performance between 2 student cohorts taught in a nutrition flipped curriculum (graduation years 2023, 2024) and one cohort (graduation year 2022) taught with traditional lecture within the didactic phase of a single Mid-Atlantic PA program. Exam scores between cohorts were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and potential confounding student variables were assessed with multiple regression. Results Examination performance was similar between traditional and flipped cohorts (traditional: 2022 = 82.25 6 7.13; flipped: 2023 = 83.33 6 9.26; 2024 = 83.15 6 8.76; P = .63). The only significant covariate to predict nutrition exam question scores was PA school grade point average (b = 10.56, P <.001). Discussion Scores on nutrition examination questions were similar between flipped and traditional teaching methods, and the only predictive student factor was PA school grade point average. Future studies should explore a flipped classroom approach in developing students’ nutrition assessment skills, such as taking a nutrition history and evaluating the appropriateness of a patient’s diet. Future evaluations can also explore the student learning experience in a flipped classroom.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005198056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105005198056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000676
DO - 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000676
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005198056
SN - 1941-9430
JO - Journal of Physician Assistant Education
JF - Journal of Physician Assistant Education
M1 - 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000676
ER -