A Profile of Paroling Authorities in America: The Strange Bedfellows of Politics and Professionalism

Mario A. Paparozzi, Joel M. Caplan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of discretionary decision making in parole has been the subject of much criticism over the past three decades. Whether it is either discretionary decision making per se or the context within which such decisions are made that is problematic is unknown. This article captures a profile of how paroling authorities are organized, how their members are appointed, and the work experience, training, and credential requirements that underpin the appointment process. The importance of the relationship between professionalism and discretionary decision making is discussed. Recommendations are made for future studies addressing the relationship between professional qualifications of paroling authority members and parole outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-425
Number of pages25
JournalThe Prison Journal
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Keywords

  • corrections
  • discretion
  • mandatory parole
  • parole
  • parole board
  • reentry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Profile of Paroling Authorities in America: The Strange Bedfellows of Politics and Professionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this