A smooth version of the step-up procedure for multiple tests of hypotheses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cohen and Sackrowitz [2005. Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure. Ann. Statist. 33, 145-158; 2007. More on the inadmissibility of step-up. J. Multivariate Anal. 97, 481-492] have demonstrated that the popular step-up (SU) multiple testing procedure is inadmissible under a wide variety of conditions. All conditions, however, did assume a permutation invariant (symmetric) model. In this paper we find a necessary condition for admissibility of multiple testing procedures in the asymmetric case. Once again SU does not satisfy the condition and is inadmissible. Since SU has a somewhat less favorable practical property and a less favorable theoretical property, we offer a smooth version of SU which retains the favorable practical properties and avoids some of the less favorable ones. In terms of performance the smooth version and nonsmooth version seem to be comparable at least in low dimensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3352-3360
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Volume137
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Multiple Tests
Test of Hypothesis
Inadmissibility
Multiple Testing
Testing
Multiple Endpoints
Bayes Procedures
Admissibility
Permutation
Necessary Conditions
Invariant
Model

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics

Keywords

  • Admissibility
  • Classification risk function
  • Exponential family
  • Nonsymmetric procedures
  • Permutation invariant procedures

Cite this

@article{46465ac3b86642208b2754f43d8b8dba,
title = "A smooth version of the step-up procedure for multiple tests of hypotheses",
abstract = "Cohen and Sackrowitz [2005. Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure. Ann. Statist. 33, 145-158; 2007. More on the inadmissibility of step-up. J. Multivariate Anal. 97, 481-492] have demonstrated that the popular step-up (SU) multiple testing procedure is inadmissible under a wide variety of conditions. All conditions, however, did assume a permutation invariant (symmetric) model. In this paper we find a necessary condition for admissibility of multiple testing procedures in the asymmetric case. Once again SU does not satisfy the condition and is inadmissible. Since SU has a somewhat less favorable practical property and a less favorable theoretical property, we offer a smooth version of SU which retains the favorable practical properties and avoids some of the less favorable ones. In terms of performance the smooth version and nonsmooth version seem to be comparable at least in low dimensions.",
keywords = "Admissibility, Classification risk function, Exponential family, Nonsymmetric procedures, Permutation invariant procedures",
author = "Arthur Cohen and John Kolassa and Harold Sackrowitz",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "3352--3360",
journal = "Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference",
issn = "0378-3758",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

A smooth version of the step-up procedure for multiple tests of hypotheses. / Cohen, Arthur; Kolassa, John; Sackrowitz, Harold.

In: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 137, No. 11, 01.11.2007, p. 3352-3360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A smooth version of the step-up procedure for multiple tests of hypotheses

AU - Cohen, Arthur

AU - Kolassa, John

AU - Sackrowitz, Harold

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Cohen and Sackrowitz [2005. Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure. Ann. Statist. 33, 145-158; 2007. More on the inadmissibility of step-up. J. Multivariate Anal. 97, 481-492] have demonstrated that the popular step-up (SU) multiple testing procedure is inadmissible under a wide variety of conditions. All conditions, however, did assume a permutation invariant (symmetric) model. In this paper we find a necessary condition for admissibility of multiple testing procedures in the asymmetric case. Once again SU does not satisfy the condition and is inadmissible. Since SU has a somewhat less favorable practical property and a less favorable theoretical property, we offer a smooth version of SU which retains the favorable practical properties and avoids some of the less favorable ones. In terms of performance the smooth version and nonsmooth version seem to be comparable at least in low dimensions.

AB - Cohen and Sackrowitz [2005. Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure. Ann. Statist. 33, 145-158; 2007. More on the inadmissibility of step-up. J. Multivariate Anal. 97, 481-492] have demonstrated that the popular step-up (SU) multiple testing procedure is inadmissible under a wide variety of conditions. All conditions, however, did assume a permutation invariant (symmetric) model. In this paper we find a necessary condition for admissibility of multiple testing procedures in the asymmetric case. Once again SU does not satisfy the condition and is inadmissible. Since SU has a somewhat less favorable practical property and a less favorable theoretical property, we offer a smooth version of SU which retains the favorable practical properties and avoids some of the less favorable ones. In terms of performance the smooth version and nonsmooth version seem to be comparable at least in low dimensions.

KW - Admissibility

KW - Classification risk function

KW - Exponential family

KW - Nonsymmetric procedures

KW - Permutation invariant procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447539521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447539521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34447539521

VL - 137

SP - 3352

EP - 3360

JO - Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

JF - Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

SN - 0378-3758

IS - 11

ER -