A Survey of Ethical Conduct in Risk Management: Environmental Economists

Laura Goldberg, Michael Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

A sample survey of members of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) found relatively low rates of obvious ethical misconduct, such as data fabrication and falsification, and higher rates of dubious behaviors, such as deliberate overstatement of positive and understatement of negative results. AERE members reported that job-related pressures—including competition with peers, pressure due to professional implication and on-the-job pressure—were the most important causes. The most effective preventive measures, according to respondents, were discussion of ethics in existing classes, codes of ethics, and short courses at professional meetings. The vast majority of AERE members were against government audits and regulations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-343
Number of pages13
JournalEthics & Behavior
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1994

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Survey of Ethical Conduct in Risk Management: Environmental Economists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this