A survey of theories of international production

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 1970s and early 1980s it became fashionable to search for general theories of international production which encompassed all the contributions of earlier writers thought to be significant. These were sometimes advanced as general theories of the multinational corporation (MNC), the main institutional agent of international production, or general theories of foreign direct investment (FDI), the major means by which international production is financed.1 When confronted with evidence on certain types of international production that their ‘general’ theories did not seem to explain, the proponents of such theories all too frequently seemed to respond either by dismissing the relevance of the evidence or by adapting their terminology to accommodate it. To the extent they succeeded their theories became increasingly cumbersome and less operational (as discussed by Buckley, 1983).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Nature of the Transnational Firm
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages10-57
Number of pages48
ISBN (Electronic)9781134933075
ISBN (Print)0203982592, 9780415167871
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General theory
Multinational corporations
Production theory
Foreign direct investment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Cantwell, J. (2005). A survey of theories of international production. In The Nature of the Transnational Firm (pp. 10-57). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982594-10
Cantwell, John. / A survey of theories of international production. The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Taylor and Francis, 2005. pp. 10-57
@inbook{ec85c4a1b5694f5f902ec56d17d4f114,
title = "A survey of theories of international production",
abstract = "In the 1970s and early 1980s it became fashionable to search for general theories of international production which encompassed all the contributions of earlier writers thought to be significant. These were sometimes advanced as general theories of the multinational corporation (MNC), the main institutional agent of international production, or general theories of foreign direct investment (FDI), the major means by which international production is financed.1 When confronted with evidence on certain types of international production that their ‘general’ theories did not seem to explain, the proponents of such theories all too frequently seemed to respond either by dismissing the relevance of the evidence or by adapting their terminology to accommodate it. To the extent they succeeded their theories became increasingly cumbersome and less operational (as discussed by Buckley, 1983).",
author = "John Cantwell",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203982594-10",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0203982592",
pages = "10--57",
booktitle = "The Nature of the Transnational Firm",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
address = "United States",

}

Cantwell, J 2005, A survey of theories of international production. in The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Taylor and Francis, pp. 10-57. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982594-10

A survey of theories of international production. / Cantwell, John.

The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Taylor and Francis, 2005. p. 10-57.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A survey of theories of international production

AU - Cantwell, John

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - In the 1970s and early 1980s it became fashionable to search for general theories of international production which encompassed all the contributions of earlier writers thought to be significant. These were sometimes advanced as general theories of the multinational corporation (MNC), the main institutional agent of international production, or general theories of foreign direct investment (FDI), the major means by which international production is financed.1 When confronted with evidence on certain types of international production that their ‘general’ theories did not seem to explain, the proponents of such theories all too frequently seemed to respond either by dismissing the relevance of the evidence or by adapting their terminology to accommodate it. To the extent they succeeded their theories became increasingly cumbersome and less operational (as discussed by Buckley, 1983).

AB - In the 1970s and early 1980s it became fashionable to search for general theories of international production which encompassed all the contributions of earlier writers thought to be significant. These were sometimes advanced as general theories of the multinational corporation (MNC), the main institutional agent of international production, or general theories of foreign direct investment (FDI), the major means by which international production is financed.1 When confronted with evidence on certain types of international production that their ‘general’ theories did not seem to explain, the proponents of such theories all too frequently seemed to respond either by dismissing the relevance of the evidence or by adapting their terminology to accommodate it. To the extent they succeeded their theories became increasingly cumbersome and less operational (as discussed by Buckley, 1983).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071021149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071021149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203982594-10

DO - 10.4324/9780203982594-10

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85071021149

SN - 0203982592

SN - 9780415167871

SP - 10

EP - 57

BT - The Nature of the Transnational Firm

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -

Cantwell J. A survey of theories of international production. In The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Taylor and Francis. 2005. p. 10-57 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982594-10