A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality

A. Rani Elwy, Erik J. Groessl, Susan V. Eisen, Kristen E. Riley, Meghan Maiya, Jennifer P. Lee, Andrew Sarkin, Crystal L. Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context The scientific study of yoga requires rigorous methodology. This review aimed to systematically assess all studies of yoga interventions to (1) determine yoga intervention characteristics; (2) examine methodologic quality of the subset of RCTs; and (3) explore how well these interventions are reported. Evidence acquisition Searches were conducted through April 2012 in PubMed, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Ovid's Alternative and Complementary Medicine database using the text term yoga, and through handsearching five journals. Original studies were included if the intervention (1) consisted of at least one yoga session with some type of health assessment; (2) targeted adults aged ≥18 years; (3) was published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal; and (4) was available for review. Evidence synthesis Of 3,062 studies identified, 465 studies in 30 countries were included. Analyses were conducted through 2013. Most interventions took place in India (n=228) or the U.S. (n=124), with intensity ranging from a single yoga session up to two sessions per day. Intervention lengths ranged from one session to 2 years. Asanas (poses) were mentioned as yoga components in 369 (79%) interventions, but were either minimally or not at all described in 200 (54%) of these. Most interventions (74%, n=336) did not include home practice. Of the included studies, 151 were RCTs. RCT quality was rated as poor. Conclusions This review highlights the inadequate reporting and methodologic limitations of current yoga intervention research, which limits study interpretation and comparability. Recommendations for future methodology and reporting are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-232
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Yoga
Complementary Therapies
PubMed
India
Language
Databases
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Elwy, A. Rani ; Groessl, Erik J. ; Eisen, Susan V. ; Riley, Kristen E. ; Maiya, Meghan ; Lee, Jennifer P. ; Sarkin, Andrew ; Park, Crystal L. / A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 220-232.
@article{c254535575904e43ae4c57cd2ab07952,
title = "A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality",
abstract = "Context The scientific study of yoga requires rigorous methodology. This review aimed to systematically assess all studies of yoga interventions to (1) determine yoga intervention characteristics; (2) examine methodologic quality of the subset of RCTs; and (3) explore how well these interventions are reported. Evidence acquisition Searches were conducted through April 2012 in PubMed, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Ovid's Alternative and Complementary Medicine database using the text term yoga, and through handsearching five journals. Original studies were included if the intervention (1) consisted of at least one yoga session with some type of health assessment; (2) targeted adults aged ≥18 years; (3) was published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal; and (4) was available for review. Evidence synthesis Of 3,062 studies identified, 465 studies in 30 countries were included. Analyses were conducted through 2013. Most interventions took place in India (n=228) or the U.S. (n=124), with intensity ranging from a single yoga session up to two sessions per day. Intervention lengths ranged from one session to 2 years. Asanas (poses) were mentioned as yoga components in 369 (79{\%}) interventions, but were either minimally or not at all described in 200 (54{\%}) of these. Most interventions (74{\%}, n=336) did not include home practice. Of the included studies, 151 were RCTs. RCT quality was rated as poor. Conclusions This review highlights the inadequate reporting and methodologic limitations of current yoga intervention research, which limits study interpretation and comparability. Recommendations for future methodology and reporting are discussed.",
author = "Elwy, {A. Rani} and Groessl, {Erik J.} and Eisen, {Susan V.} and Riley, {Kristen E.} and Meghan Maiya and Lee, {Jennifer P.} and Andrew Sarkin and Park, {Crystal L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "220--232",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Elwy, AR, Groessl, EJ, Eisen, SV, Riley, KE, Maiya, M, Lee, JP, Sarkin, A & Park, CL 2014, 'A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012

A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality. / Elwy, A. Rani; Groessl, Erik J.; Eisen, Susan V.; Riley, Kristen E.; Maiya, Meghan; Lee, Jennifer P.; Sarkin, Andrew; Park, Crystal L.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 2, 08.2014, p. 220-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality

AU - Elwy, A. Rani

AU - Groessl, Erik J.

AU - Eisen, Susan V.

AU - Riley, Kristen E.

AU - Maiya, Meghan

AU - Lee, Jennifer P.

AU - Sarkin, Andrew

AU - Park, Crystal L.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Context The scientific study of yoga requires rigorous methodology. This review aimed to systematically assess all studies of yoga interventions to (1) determine yoga intervention characteristics; (2) examine methodologic quality of the subset of RCTs; and (3) explore how well these interventions are reported. Evidence acquisition Searches were conducted through April 2012 in PubMed, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Ovid's Alternative and Complementary Medicine database using the text term yoga, and through handsearching five journals. Original studies were included if the intervention (1) consisted of at least one yoga session with some type of health assessment; (2) targeted adults aged ≥18 years; (3) was published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal; and (4) was available for review. Evidence synthesis Of 3,062 studies identified, 465 studies in 30 countries were included. Analyses were conducted through 2013. Most interventions took place in India (n=228) or the U.S. (n=124), with intensity ranging from a single yoga session up to two sessions per day. Intervention lengths ranged from one session to 2 years. Asanas (poses) were mentioned as yoga components in 369 (79%) interventions, but were either minimally or not at all described in 200 (54%) of these. Most interventions (74%, n=336) did not include home practice. Of the included studies, 151 were RCTs. RCT quality was rated as poor. Conclusions This review highlights the inadequate reporting and methodologic limitations of current yoga intervention research, which limits study interpretation and comparability. Recommendations for future methodology and reporting are discussed.

AB - Context The scientific study of yoga requires rigorous methodology. This review aimed to systematically assess all studies of yoga interventions to (1) determine yoga intervention characteristics; (2) examine methodologic quality of the subset of RCTs; and (3) explore how well these interventions are reported. Evidence acquisition Searches were conducted through April 2012 in PubMed, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Ovid's Alternative and Complementary Medicine database using the text term yoga, and through handsearching five journals. Original studies were included if the intervention (1) consisted of at least one yoga session with some type of health assessment; (2) targeted adults aged ≥18 years; (3) was published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal; and (4) was available for review. Evidence synthesis Of 3,062 studies identified, 465 studies in 30 countries were included. Analyses were conducted through 2013. Most interventions took place in India (n=228) or the U.S. (n=124), with intensity ranging from a single yoga session up to two sessions per day. Intervention lengths ranged from one session to 2 years. Asanas (poses) were mentioned as yoga components in 369 (79%) interventions, but were either minimally or not at all described in 200 (54%) of these. Most interventions (74%, n=336) did not include home practice. Of the included studies, 151 were RCTs. RCT quality was rated as poor. Conclusions This review highlights the inadequate reporting and methodologic limitations of current yoga intervention research, which limits study interpretation and comparability. Recommendations for future methodology and reporting are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904647202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904647202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 24996759

AN - SCOPUS:84904647202

VL - 47

SP - 220

EP - 232

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 2

ER -