Action and representation – A comment on Batel and Castro ‘Re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology’

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long-standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-414
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Bethanidine
Psychology
Focus Groups
Social Theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Keywords

  • action
  • communication
  • conversation analysis
  • discourse analysis
  • discursive psychology
  • interviews
  • naturalistic data
  • qualitative research
  • thematic analysis
  • theory of social representations

Cite this

@article{a9dc214cf25941c7afd0c4add186de6f,
title = "Action and representation – A comment on Batel and Castro ‘Re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology’",
abstract = "Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long-standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.",
keywords = "action, communication, conversation analysis, discourse analysis, discursive psychology, interviews, naturalistic data, qualitative research, thematic analysis, theory of social representations",
author = "Jonathan Potter",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/bjso.12275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "410--414",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Action and representation – A comment on Batel and Castro ‘Re-opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology’

AU - Potter, Jonathan

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long-standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.

AB - Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long-standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.

KW - action

KW - communication

KW - conversation analysis

KW - discourse analysis

KW - discursive psychology

KW - interviews

KW - naturalistic data

KW - qualitative research

KW - thematic analysis

KW - theory of social representations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052798151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052798151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjso.12275

DO - 10.1111/bjso.12275

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85052798151

VL - 58

SP - 410

EP - 414

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 2

ER -