TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing College Food Security
T2 - Priority Research Gaps
AU - Landry, Matthew J.
AU - Heying, Emily
AU - Qamar, Zubaida
AU - Hagedorn-Hatfield, Rebecca L.
AU - Savoie-Roskos, Mateja R.
AU - Cuite, Cara L.
AU - Zigmont, Victoria A.
AU - Oonorasak, Kendra
AU - Chen, Susan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Despite over a decade of both quantitative and qualitative studies, food insecurity among United States college/university students remains a pervasive problem within higher education. The purpose of this perspective piece was to highlight research gaps in the area of college food insecurity and provide rationale for the research community to focus on these gaps going forward. A group of food insecurity researchers from a variety of higher education institutions across the United States identified five thematic areas of research gaps: screening and estimates of food insecurity; longitudinal changes in food insecurity; impact of food insecurity on broader health and academic outcomes; evaluation of impact, sustainability, and cost effectiveness of existing programs and initiatives; and state and federal policies and programs. Within these thematic areas, 19 specific research gaps were identified that have limited or no peer-reviewed, published research. These research gaps result in a limited understanding of the magnitude, severity, and persistence of college food insecurity, the negative short- and long-term impacts of food insecurity on health, academic performance, and overall college experience, and effective solutions and policies to prevent or meaningfully address food insecurity among college students. Research in these identified priority areas may help accelerate action and interdisciplinary collaboration to alleviate food insecurity among college students and play a critical role in informing the development or refinement of programs and services that better support college student food security needs.
AB - Despite over a decade of both quantitative and qualitative studies, food insecurity among United States college/university students remains a pervasive problem within higher education. The purpose of this perspective piece was to highlight research gaps in the area of college food insecurity and provide rationale for the research community to focus on these gaps going forward. A group of food insecurity researchers from a variety of higher education institutions across the United States identified five thematic areas of research gaps: screening and estimates of food insecurity; longitudinal changes in food insecurity; impact of food insecurity on broader health and academic outcomes; evaluation of impact, sustainability, and cost effectiveness of existing programs and initiatives; and state and federal policies and programs. Within these thematic areas, 19 specific research gaps were identified that have limited or no peer-reviewed, published research. These research gaps result in a limited understanding of the magnitude, severity, and persistence of college food insecurity, the negative short- and long-term impacts of food insecurity on health, academic performance, and overall college experience, and effective solutions and policies to prevent or meaningfully address food insecurity among college students. Research in these identified priority areas may help accelerate action and interdisciplinary collaboration to alleviate food insecurity among college students and play a critical role in informing the development or refinement of programs and services that better support college student food security needs.
KW - campus programs
KW - college students
KW - food insecurity
KW - higher education
KW - nutrition policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160105082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160105082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954422423000094
DO - 10.1017/S0954422423000094
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37158045
AN - SCOPUS:85160105082
SN - 0954-4224
JO - Nutrition Research Reviews
JF - Nutrition Research Reviews
ER -