TY - GEN
T1 - Advantage of overlapping clusters for minimizing conductance
AU - Khandekar, Rohit
AU - Kortsarz, Guy
AU - Mirrokni, Vahab
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Graph clustering is an important problem with applications to bioinformatics, community discovery in social networks, distributed computing, etc. While most of the research in this area has focused on clustering using disjoint clusters, many real datasets have inherently overlapping clusters. We compare overlapping and non-overlapping clusterings in graphs in the context of minimizing their conductance. It is known that allowing clusters to overlap gives better results in practice. We prove that overlapping clustering may be significantly better than non-overlapping clustering with respect to conductance, even in a theoretical setting. For minimizing the maximum conductance over the clusters, we give examples demonstrating that allowing overlaps can yield significantly better clusterings, namely, one that has much smaller optimum. In addition for the min-max variant, the overlapping version admits a simple approximation algorithm, while our algorithm for the non-overlapping version is complex and yields worse approximation ratio due to the presence of the additional constraint. Somewhat surprisingly, for the problem of minimizing the sum of conductances, we found out that allowing overlap does not really help. We show how to apply a general technique to transform any overlapping clustering into a non-overlapping one with only a modest increase in the sum of conductances. This uncrossing technique is of independent interest and may find further applications in the future.
AB - Graph clustering is an important problem with applications to bioinformatics, community discovery in social networks, distributed computing, etc. While most of the research in this area has focused on clustering using disjoint clusters, many real datasets have inherently overlapping clusters. We compare overlapping and non-overlapping clusterings in graphs in the context of minimizing their conductance. It is known that allowing clusters to overlap gives better results in practice. We prove that overlapping clustering may be significantly better than non-overlapping clustering with respect to conductance, even in a theoretical setting. For minimizing the maximum conductance over the clusters, we give examples demonstrating that allowing overlaps can yield significantly better clusterings, namely, one that has much smaller optimum. In addition for the min-max variant, the overlapping version admits a simple approximation algorithm, while our algorithm for the non-overlapping version is complex and yields worse approximation ratio due to the presence of the additional constraint. Somewhat surprisingly, for the problem of minimizing the sum of conductances, we found out that allowing overlap does not really help. We show how to apply a general technique to transform any overlapping clustering into a non-overlapping one with only a modest increase in the sum of conductances. This uncrossing technique is of independent interest and may find further applications in the future.
KW - dynamic programming
KW - graph clustering
KW - overlapping clustering
KW - tree decomposition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860833067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860833067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-29344-3_42
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-29344-3_42
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84860833067
SN - 9783642293436
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 494
EP - 505
BT - LATIN 2012
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 10th Latin American Symposiumon Theoretical Informatics, LATIN 2012
Y2 - 16 April 2012 through 20 April 2012
ER -