An assessment of the feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) near a municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, U.S.A

J. T. Duffy-Anderson, K. W. Able

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus Walbaum) (20-50 mm TL) around a large, municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, USA. Replicate, 3-h feeding experiments were conducted using benthic cages (0.64 m2) deployed under, at the edge, and outside of the pier during late spring and early summer in 1998 and 1999. Significantly more winter flounder caged under piers had empty stomachs ((Mathematical expression)=71.9%) than at the edge or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=29.2% and 14.4%, respectively). Feeding intensity was significantly higher outside of the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.40%) than the edge or under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.19% and 0.03%, respectively). Simultaneous with feeding experiments, benthic core samples were collected adjacent to cages. Variability was high, but abundances of prey were consistently higher under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=200.14±113.3 SD in 1998; 335±290.2 in 1999) than at the edge ((Mathematical expression)=126.6±50.2 in 1998; 70.8±68.5 in 1999) or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=53.4±16.1 in 1998; 123.8±193.9 in 1999). No significant differences in prey biomass were determined, suggesting that small, numerous prey were available under the pier and fewer, larger taxa were present at the edge and outside. Data indicate that feeding is suppressed among young-of-the-year winter flounder caged under piers in spite of sufficient prey available. Based on these and other experiments we submit that areas under piers are not suitable long-term habitats for juvenile fish because they interfere with normal feeding activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-440
Number of pages11
JournalEstuaries
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2001

Fingerprint

Hudson River
Pseudopleuronectes americanus
Piers
pier
Estuaries
estuaries
Rivers
estuary
winter
river
cages
open water
stomach
water
young
summer
biomass
Core samples
Water
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Aquatic Science
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

@article{a4be7c4d8bf5476a821f5595d8c53843,
title = "An assessment of the feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) near a municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, U.S.A",
abstract = "We examined feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus Walbaum) (20-50 mm TL) around a large, municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, USA. Replicate, 3-h feeding experiments were conducted using benthic cages (0.64 m2) deployed under, at the edge, and outside of the pier during late spring and early summer in 1998 and 1999. Significantly more winter flounder caged under piers had empty stomachs ((Mathematical expression)=71.9{\%}) than at the edge or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=29.2{\%} and 14.4{\%}, respectively). Feeding intensity was significantly higher outside of the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.40{\%}) than the edge or under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.19{\%} and 0.03{\%}, respectively). Simultaneous with feeding experiments, benthic core samples were collected adjacent to cages. Variability was high, but abundances of prey were consistently higher under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=200.14±113.3 SD in 1998; 335±290.2 in 1999) than at the edge ((Mathematical expression)=126.6±50.2 in 1998; 70.8±68.5 in 1999) or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=53.4±16.1 in 1998; 123.8±193.9 in 1999). No significant differences in prey biomass were determined, suggesting that small, numerous prey were available under the pier and fewer, larger taxa were present at the edge and outside. Data indicate that feeding is suppressed among young-of-the-year winter flounder caged under piers in spite of sufficient prey available. Based on these and other experiments we submit that areas under piers are not suitable long-term habitats for juvenile fish because they interfere with normal feeding activities.",
author = "Duffy-Anderson, {J. T.} and Able, {K. W.}",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF02696085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "430--440",
journal = "Estuaries and Coasts",
issn = "1559-2723",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of the feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) near a municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, U.S.A

AU - Duffy-Anderson, J. T.

AU - Able, K. W.

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - We examined feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus Walbaum) (20-50 mm TL) around a large, municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, USA. Replicate, 3-h feeding experiments were conducted using benthic cages (0.64 m2) deployed under, at the edge, and outside of the pier during late spring and early summer in 1998 and 1999. Significantly more winter flounder caged under piers had empty stomachs ((Mathematical expression)=71.9%) than at the edge or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=29.2% and 14.4%, respectively). Feeding intensity was significantly higher outside of the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.40%) than the edge or under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.19% and 0.03%, respectively). Simultaneous with feeding experiments, benthic core samples were collected adjacent to cages. Variability was high, but abundances of prey were consistently higher under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=200.14±113.3 SD in 1998; 335±290.2 in 1999) than at the edge ((Mathematical expression)=126.6±50.2 in 1998; 70.8±68.5 in 1999) or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=53.4±16.1 in 1998; 123.8±193.9 in 1999). No significant differences in prey biomass were determined, suggesting that small, numerous prey were available under the pier and fewer, larger taxa were present at the edge and outside. Data indicate that feeding is suppressed among young-of-the-year winter flounder caged under piers in spite of sufficient prey available. Based on these and other experiments we submit that areas under piers are not suitable long-term habitats for juvenile fish because they interfere with normal feeding activities.

AB - We examined feeding success of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus Walbaum) (20-50 mm TL) around a large, municipal pier in the Hudson River estuary, USA. Replicate, 3-h feeding experiments were conducted using benthic cages (0.64 m2) deployed under, at the edge, and outside of the pier during late spring and early summer in 1998 and 1999. Significantly more winter flounder caged under piers had empty stomachs ((Mathematical expression)=71.9%) than at the edge or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=29.2% and 14.4%, respectively). Feeding intensity was significantly higher outside of the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.40%) than the edge or under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=0.19% and 0.03%, respectively). Simultaneous with feeding experiments, benthic core samples were collected adjacent to cages. Variability was high, but abundances of prey were consistently higher under the pier ((Mathematical expression)=200.14±113.3 SD in 1998; 335±290.2 in 1999) than at the edge ((Mathematical expression)=126.6±50.2 in 1998; 70.8±68.5 in 1999) or in open water ((Mathematical expression)=53.4±16.1 in 1998; 123.8±193.9 in 1999). No significant differences in prey biomass were determined, suggesting that small, numerous prey were available under the pier and fewer, larger taxa were present at the edge and outside. Data indicate that feeding is suppressed among young-of-the-year winter flounder caged under piers in spite of sufficient prey available. Based on these and other experiments we submit that areas under piers are not suitable long-term habitats for juvenile fish because they interfere with normal feeding activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034913299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034913299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02696085

DO - 10.1007/BF02696085

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034913299

VL - 24

SP - 430

EP - 440

JO - Estuaries and Coasts

JF - Estuaries and Coasts

SN - 1559-2723

IS - 3

ER -