@article{e425ff0cd14249c6801a37f074e1614d,
title = "An examination of non-linear and passive technology transfer in the space sector: Consideration of the Contingent Effectiveness Model as a basis for formal modeling",
abstract = "Technology transfer has been a cornerstone of the justification for public expenditure of space technology development programs since at least the creation of NASA out of its predecessor agencies. Research into its mechanisms has, however, been largely qualitative and focused on actively managed, one-way transfer of technology from agencies to industry. In this paper we consider the effects of a wider range of mechanisms by which space agencies affect the technical knowledgebase, and examine the Contingent Effectiveness Model as a useful framework for formalizing comparative analysis of transfers.",
keywords = "Contingent Effectiveness Model, Tech transfer quantitative modeling, Technology transfer",
author = "Jordan Smart and Haym Benaroya",
note = "Funding Information: The suit would undergo seven major iterations before deployment in Apollo. After a poor reaction to the AX3H suit developed under Hamilton{\textquoteright}s lead, ILC began lobbying for direct funding from NASA, independent of Hamilton. By the time the AX5H was in development for full IVA and EVA, the relationship had broken down, and the two teams separated, and ILC submitted a separate proposal known as the AX5L. The AX5L won the contract on the basis of being the most mobile, pressure tight, and best at retaining its shape. The AX5L would be the basis of the program going forward, undergoing only evolutionary changes until the development of the AX7L and A7L production models. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.05.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "39--47",
journal = "Space Policy",
issn = "0265-9646",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
}