Aquinas on attributes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aquinas' theory of attributes is one of the most obscure, controversial parts of his thought. There is no agreement even on so basic a matter as where he falls in the standard scheme of classifying such theories: to Copleston, he is a resemblance-nominalist; to Armstrong, a "concept nominalist"; to Edwards and Spade, "almost as strong a realist as Duns Scotus"; to Gracia, Pannier, and Sullivan, neither realist nor nominalist; to Hamlyn, the Middle Ages' "prime exponent of realism," although his theory adds elements of nominalism and "conceptualism"; to Wolterstorff, just inconsistent. I now set out Aquinas' view and try to answer the vexed question of how to classify it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-41
Number of pages41
JournalMedieval Philosophy and Theology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aquinas on attributes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this