TY - JOUR
T1 - Arctic cryosphere response in the geoengineering model intercomparison project G3 and G4 scenarios
AU - Berdahl, Mira
AU - Robock, Alan
AU - Ji, Duoying
AU - Moore, John C.
AU - Jones, Andy
AU - Kravitz, Ben
AU - Watanabe, Shingo
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all participants of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project and their model development teams, CLIVAR/ WCRP Working Group on Coupled Modeling for endorsing GeoMIP, and the scientists managing the Earth System Grid data nodes who have assisted with making GeoMIP output available. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We thank David Robinson for insightful discussions and the Rutgers University Snow Lab for snow cover data. MB and AR were supported by NSF grants CBET-1240507, AGS-1157525, and ARC-0908834. Some figures were drawn with the NCAR Command Language (NCL, http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5). AJ was supported by the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). SW was supported by SOUSEI program, MEXT, Japan and his simulations were performed using the Earth Simulator. BK is supported by the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Simulations performed by BK were supported by the NASA High-End Computing Program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation at Goddard Space Flight Center.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2014/2/16
Y1 - 2014/2/16
N2 - We analyzed output from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project for the two most “realistic” scenarios, which use the representative concentration pathway of 4.5 Wm-2 by 2100 (RCP4.5) as the control run and inject sulfate aerosol precursors into the stratosphere. The first experiment, G3, is specified to keep RCP4.5 top of atmosphere net radiation at 2020 values by injection of sulfate aerosols, and the second, G4, injects 5 Tg SO2 per year. We ask whether geoengineering by injection of sulfate aerosols into the lower stratosphere from the years 2020 to 2070 is able to prevent the demise of Northern Hemispere minimum annual sea ice extent or slow spring Northern Hemispere snow cover loss. We show that in all available models, despite geoengineering efforts, September sea ice extents still decrease from 2020 to 2070, although not as quickly as in RCP4.5. In two of five models, total September ice loss occurs before 2060. Spring snow extent is increased from 2020 to 2070 compared to RCP4.5 although there is still a negative trend in 3 of 4 models. Because of the climate system lag in responding to the existing radiative forcing, to stop Arctic sea ice and snow from continuing to melt, the imposed forcing would have to be large enough to also counteract the existing radiative imbalance. After the cessation of sulfate aerosol injection in 2070, the climate system rebounds to the warmer RCP4.5 state quickly, and thus, any sea ice or snow retention as a result of geoengineering is lost within a decade.
AB - We analyzed output from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project for the two most “realistic” scenarios, which use the representative concentration pathway of 4.5 Wm-2 by 2100 (RCP4.5) as the control run and inject sulfate aerosol precursors into the stratosphere. The first experiment, G3, is specified to keep RCP4.5 top of atmosphere net radiation at 2020 values by injection of sulfate aerosols, and the second, G4, injects 5 Tg SO2 per year. We ask whether geoengineering by injection of sulfate aerosols into the lower stratosphere from the years 2020 to 2070 is able to prevent the demise of Northern Hemispere minimum annual sea ice extent or slow spring Northern Hemispere snow cover loss. We show that in all available models, despite geoengineering efforts, September sea ice extents still decrease from 2020 to 2070, although not as quickly as in RCP4.5. In two of five models, total September ice loss occurs before 2060. Spring snow extent is increased from 2020 to 2070 compared to RCP4.5 although there is still a negative trend in 3 of 4 models. Because of the climate system lag in responding to the existing radiative forcing, to stop Arctic sea ice and snow from continuing to melt, the imposed forcing would have to be large enough to also counteract the existing radiative imbalance. After the cessation of sulfate aerosol injection in 2070, the climate system rebounds to the warmer RCP4.5 state quickly, and thus, any sea ice or snow retention as a result of geoengineering is lost within a decade.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898941474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898941474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2013JD020627
DO - 10.1002/2013JD020627
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84898941474
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 119
SP - 1308
EP - 1321
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research
IS - 3
ER -