TY - JOUR
T1 - Arsenic exposure levels of petrochemical workers in three workplace settings in Rayong Province, Thailand
AU - Boonkhao, Laksanee
AU - Phanprasit, Wantanee
AU - Robson, Mark Gregory
AU - Sujirarat, Dusit
AU - Kwonpongsagoon, Suphaphat
AU - Tangtong, Chaiyanun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2017/10/3
Y1 - 2017/10/3
N2 - Background: Crude oil and natural gas are often contaminated with arsenic. As a carcinogen, arsenic contamination in the workplace is of concern, particularly when urinary arsenic levels are higher than the standard. The aim of this study was to identify exposure sources of arsenic among petrochemical workers. Methods: A total of 188 operators and 30 office workers participated in the study. Ninety-three workplace air samples, three main meals in five consecutive days, and drinking water were collected from each participant. Urine was collected at the end of the day after the last food sample was collected from each subject. Urine samples where arsenic concentration exceeded 100 mg/L were further analyzed to identify species. Results: The average arsenic concentrations in operators' and office workers' food and urine were 0.55 ± 1.00 and 0.49 ± 0.67 mg/kg; and 76.43 ± 107.36 and 149.92 ± 200.28 mg/L, respectively. The arsenic concentrations in air and water were well below their standards. The urinary arsenic correlated well with arsenic in the food but not in the air and water. Conclusion: Occupational exposure to arsenic among operators and office workers was lower than 1% TLV (Threshold limit value) and did not differ significantly. The major source of arsenic exposure Q2 was food.
AB - Background: Crude oil and natural gas are often contaminated with arsenic. As a carcinogen, arsenic contamination in the workplace is of concern, particularly when urinary arsenic levels are higher than the standard. The aim of this study was to identify exposure sources of arsenic among petrochemical workers. Methods: A total of 188 operators and 30 office workers participated in the study. Ninety-three workplace air samples, three main meals in five consecutive days, and drinking water were collected from each participant. Urine was collected at the end of the day after the last food sample was collected from each subject. Urine samples where arsenic concentration exceeded 100 mg/L were further analyzed to identify species. Results: The average arsenic concentrations in operators' and office workers' food and urine were 0.55 ± 1.00 and 0.49 ± 0.67 mg/kg; and 76.43 ± 107.36 and 149.92 ± 200.28 mg/L, respectively. The arsenic concentrations in air and water were well below their standards. The urinary arsenic correlated well with arsenic in the food but not in the air and water. Conclusion: Occupational exposure to arsenic among operators and office workers was lower than 1% TLV (Threshold limit value) and did not differ significantly. The major source of arsenic exposure Q2 was food.
KW - arsenic
KW - cooked food
KW - drinking water
KW - exposure
KW - petrochemical workers
KW - urinary arsenic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026362583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026362583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10807039.2017.1333406
DO - 10.1080/10807039.2017.1333406
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85026362583
SN - 1080-7039
VL - 23
SP - 1645
EP - 1654
JO - Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
JF - Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
IS - 7
ER -