Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: Insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects

Juan Carlos Ciscar, James Rising, Robert E. Kopp, Luc Feyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Climate change will impact many economic sectors and aspects of natural and human wellbeing. Quantifying these impacts as they vary across regions, sectors, time, and social and climatological scenarios supports detailed planning, policy, and risk management. This article summarises and compares recent climate impact assessments in Europe (the JRC PESETA III project) and the USA (the American Climate Prospectus project). Both implement a multi-sector perspective combining high resolution climate data with sectoral impact and economic models. The assessments differ in their coverage of sectors and scenarios, mix of empirical and process-based methods, handling of uncertainty, and representation of damages. Despite the dissimilarities, projected relative economic impacts are comparable, with human mortality as the dominant impact category. Both studies further show a large spatial heterogeneity of impacts that may amplify pre-existing economic inequality in the EU and US, and that mitigation can considerably reduce economic impacts. The comparison highlights the various decision-points involved in interdisciplinary climate impact modelling and lessons learnt in both projects, on the basis of which we provide recommendations for further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number084010
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 26 2019

Fingerprint

Climate Change
Climate
Climate change
Economics
climate effect
economic impact
climate change
climate
Economic Models
economics
Risk Management
mitigation
Uncertainty
mortality
damage
Risk management
modeling
Mortality
project
Planning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Keywords

  • American climate prospectus project
  • JRC PESETA project
  • climate impacts, damages
  • empirical models
  • integrated assessment modeling
  • process models

Cite this

@article{49d773cc644b4d92a981ecbcb5616e2e,
title = "Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: Insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects",
abstract = "Climate change will impact many economic sectors and aspects of natural and human wellbeing. Quantifying these impacts as they vary across regions, sectors, time, and social and climatological scenarios supports detailed planning, policy, and risk management. This article summarises and compares recent climate impact assessments in Europe (the JRC PESETA III project) and the USA (the American Climate Prospectus project). Both implement a multi-sector perspective combining high resolution climate data with sectoral impact and economic models. The assessments differ in their coverage of sectors and scenarios, mix of empirical and process-based methods, handling of uncertainty, and representation of damages. Despite the dissimilarities, projected relative economic impacts are comparable, with human mortality as the dominant impact category. Both studies further show a large spatial heterogeneity of impacts that may amplify pre-existing economic inequality in the EU and US, and that mitigation can considerably reduce economic impacts. The comparison highlights the various decision-points involved in interdisciplinary climate impact modelling and lessons learnt in both projects, on the basis of which we provide recommendations for further research.",
keywords = "American climate prospectus project, JRC PESETA project, climate impacts, damages, empirical models, integrated assessment modeling, process models",
author = "Ciscar, {Juan Carlos} and James Rising and Kopp, {Robert E.} and Luc Feyen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/ab281e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA : Insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects. / Ciscar, Juan Carlos; Rising, James; Kopp, Robert E.; Feyen, Luc.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, No. 8, 084010, 26.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA

T2 - Insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects

AU - Ciscar, Juan Carlos

AU - Rising, James

AU - Kopp, Robert E.

AU - Feyen, Luc

PY - 2019/7/26

Y1 - 2019/7/26

N2 - Climate change will impact many economic sectors and aspects of natural and human wellbeing. Quantifying these impacts as they vary across regions, sectors, time, and social and climatological scenarios supports detailed planning, policy, and risk management. This article summarises and compares recent climate impact assessments in Europe (the JRC PESETA III project) and the USA (the American Climate Prospectus project). Both implement a multi-sector perspective combining high resolution climate data with sectoral impact and economic models. The assessments differ in their coverage of sectors and scenarios, mix of empirical and process-based methods, handling of uncertainty, and representation of damages. Despite the dissimilarities, projected relative economic impacts are comparable, with human mortality as the dominant impact category. Both studies further show a large spatial heterogeneity of impacts that may amplify pre-existing economic inequality in the EU and US, and that mitigation can considerably reduce economic impacts. The comparison highlights the various decision-points involved in interdisciplinary climate impact modelling and lessons learnt in both projects, on the basis of which we provide recommendations for further research.

AB - Climate change will impact many economic sectors and aspects of natural and human wellbeing. Quantifying these impacts as they vary across regions, sectors, time, and social and climatological scenarios supports detailed planning, policy, and risk management. This article summarises and compares recent climate impact assessments in Europe (the JRC PESETA III project) and the USA (the American Climate Prospectus project). Both implement a multi-sector perspective combining high resolution climate data with sectoral impact and economic models. The assessments differ in their coverage of sectors and scenarios, mix of empirical and process-based methods, handling of uncertainty, and representation of damages. Despite the dissimilarities, projected relative economic impacts are comparable, with human mortality as the dominant impact category. Both studies further show a large spatial heterogeneity of impacts that may amplify pre-existing economic inequality in the EU and US, and that mitigation can considerably reduce economic impacts. The comparison highlights the various decision-points involved in interdisciplinary climate impact modelling and lessons learnt in both projects, on the basis of which we provide recommendations for further research.

KW - American climate prospectus project

KW - JRC PESETA project

KW - climate impacts, damages

KW - empirical models

KW - integrated assessment modeling

KW - process models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072691183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072691183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab281e

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab281e

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072691183

VL - 14

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 8

M1 - 084010

ER -