TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment and management of risk to wildlife from cadmium
AU - Burger, Joanna
N1 - Funding Information:
My research on heavy metals and risk has benefited from discussions with M. Gochfeld, B. Goldstein, C. W. Powers, K. Reuhl, and K. Cooper. I also thank Carline Dixon, Tara Shukla, Sheila Shukla, Chris Jeitner, Sean Burke, and Robert Ramos for technical assistance throughout my work. Over the years my research has been supported by grants from NIEHS Center grant (P30ES005022), EPA, Wildlife Trust, Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) through the Department of Energy (AI # DE-FC01-95EW55084, DE-FG 26-00NT 40938 and DE-FC01-06EW07053), the Office of Science and Research, and Technology, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Endangered and NonGame Species Program, and the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute. All research was conducted under a Rutgers University protocol and appropriate state and federal collecting permits. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not of any of the funding agencies.
PY - 2008/1/15
Y1 - 2008/1/15
N2 - Cadmium, a nonessential heavy metal that comes from natural and anthropogenic sources, is a teratogen, carcinogen, and a possible mutagen. Assessment of potential risk from cadmium requires understanding environmental exposure, mainly from ingestion, although there is some local exposure through inhalation. Chronic exposure is more problematic than acute exposure for wildlife. There is evidence for bioaccumulation, particularly in freshwater organisms, but evidence for biomagnification up the food chain is inconsistent; in some bird studies, cadmium levels were higher in species that are higher on the food chain than those that are lower. Some freshwater and marine invertebrates are more adversely affected by cadmium exposure than are birds and mammals. There is very little experimental laboratory research on the effects of cadmium in amphibians, birds and reptiles, and almost no data from studies of wildlife in nature. Managing the risk from cadmium to wildlife involves assessment (including ecological risk assessment), biomonitoring, setting benchmarks of effects, regulations and enforcement, and source reduction.
AB - Cadmium, a nonessential heavy metal that comes from natural and anthropogenic sources, is a teratogen, carcinogen, and a possible mutagen. Assessment of potential risk from cadmium requires understanding environmental exposure, mainly from ingestion, although there is some local exposure through inhalation. Chronic exposure is more problematic than acute exposure for wildlife. There is evidence for bioaccumulation, particularly in freshwater organisms, but evidence for biomagnification up the food chain is inconsistent; in some bird studies, cadmium levels were higher in species that are higher on the food chain than those that are lower. Some freshwater and marine invertebrates are more adversely affected by cadmium exposure than are birds and mammals. There is very little experimental laboratory research on the effects of cadmium in amphibians, birds and reptiles, and almost no data from studies of wildlife in nature. Managing the risk from cadmium to wildlife involves assessment (including ecological risk assessment), biomonitoring, setting benchmarks of effects, regulations and enforcement, and source reduction.
KW - Amphibians
KW - Assessment and management
KW - Biomonitoring
KW - Birds
KW - Cadmium
KW - Fish
KW - Invertebrates
KW - Mammals
KW - Reptiles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148976454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148976454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.037
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 17910979
AN - SCOPUS:36148976454
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 389
SP - 37
EP - 45
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
IS - 1
ER -