TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Children in Need in a Post-Soviet Context
T2 - Reflections of Child Protective Workers in Estonia
AU - Toros, Karmen
AU - LaSala, Michael C.
AU - Medar, Marju
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2015/8/8
Y1 - 2015/8/8
N2 - Child protective worker perspectives and principles are known to affect practitioner–-client interaction. However, there is little research on the principles underpinning workers’ assessment activities in transitioning post-Soviet societies where child protection is a relatively new field. This article presents the findings of a small-scale, qualitative study that explored the perspectives and principles that Estonian child protective workers utilize to inform their assessments. The respondents (N = 20) provided examples of real-life cases that reflected their assessment perspectives. The results indicated that too often workers’ assessments demonstrate an over-reliance on an authoritarian, deficit-based approach that does not sufficiently include family or child perspectives. Such an approach may suggest the lingering influence of philosophies that informed family policy during the Soviet occupation. Workers with advanced training in social work and strength-based practices were more likely to focus on family strengths, build collaborative relationships with parents and children, and report successful outcomes in their cases. This study underscores the potential influence of previous Soviet occupation on child welfare practices in Estonia and also the need for further training of the nation’s child protective workers.
AB - Child protective worker perspectives and principles are known to affect practitioner–-client interaction. However, there is little research on the principles underpinning workers’ assessment activities in transitioning post-Soviet societies where child protection is a relatively new field. This article presents the findings of a small-scale, qualitative study that explored the perspectives and principles that Estonian child protective workers utilize to inform their assessments. The respondents (N = 20) provided examples of real-life cases that reflected their assessment perspectives. The results indicated that too often workers’ assessments demonstrate an over-reliance on an authoritarian, deficit-based approach that does not sufficiently include family or child perspectives. Such an approach may suggest the lingering influence of philosophies that informed family policy during the Soviet occupation. Workers with advanced training in social work and strength-based practices were more likely to focus on family strengths, build collaborative relationships with parents and children, and report successful outcomes in their cases. This study underscores the potential influence of previous Soviet occupation on child welfare practices in Estonia and also the need for further training of the nation’s child protective workers.
KW - Estonia
KW - assessment principles
KW - authoritarian perspective
KW - child in need
KW - child protective workers
KW - child welfare
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947028534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947028534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10522158.2015.1065458
DO - 10.1080/10522158.2015.1065458
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84947028534
SN - 1052-2158
VL - 18
SP - 267
EP - 287
JO - Journal of Family Social Work
JF - Journal of Family Social Work
IS - 4
ER -