@inproceedings{fd72f357af064d129dedc314dde62ffe,
title = "Auto-scoring discovery and confirmation bias in interpreting data during science inquiry in a microworld",
abstract = "Many students have difficulty with inquiry and difficulty with interpreting data, in particular. Of interest here is confirmation bias, i.e., when students won't discard a hypothesis based on disconfirming results, which is in direct contrast to when students make a discovery, having originally made a scientifically inaccurate hypothesis. The goal of the present study is to better understand these two data interpretation patterns and autoscore them. 145 eighth grade students engaged in inquiry with a state change microworld. Production rules were written to produce model-tracing in order to identify when students either made a discovery or engaged in confirmation bias. Interesting to note was an emerging pattern wherein many of the same students made discoveries across the four inquiry tasks. These data are important for performance assessment of inquiry and suggest that students may need adaptive scaffolding support while engaging in data interpretation.",
keywords = "Confirmation bias, Discovery, Model tracing, Production rules, Science inquiry",
author = "Janice Gobert and Juelaila Raziuddin and Koedinger, {Kenneth R.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_109",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783642391118",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "770--773",
booktitle = "Artificial Intelligence in Education - 16th International Conference, AIED 2013, Proceedings",
address = "Germany",
note = "16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2013 ; Conference date: 09-07-2013 Through 13-07-2013",
}