TY - JOUR
T1 - Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations
AU - Rudman, Laurie A.
AU - Phelan, Julie E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Preparation of this chapter was partially supported by Grant BCS-0417335 from National Science Foundation.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Backlash effects are defined as social and economic reprisals for behaving counterstereotypically (Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645). The present chapter outlines an impression-management dilemma that women face and describes the literature on backlash effects in organizations. Because women are perceived to be less competent, ambitious, and competitive (i.e., less agentic) than men, they may be overlooked for leadership positions unless they present themselves as atypical women. However, the prescriptive nature of gender stereotypes can result in negative reactions to female agency and authority (i.e., backlash). This dilemma has serious consequences for gender parity, as it undermines women at every stage of their careers. It also has consequences for organizations, as it likely contributes to female managers' higher rates of job disaffection and turnover, relative to male counterparts. In addition to specifying the consequences of backlash for women and organizations, we consider potential moderators of backlash effects and the role that backlash plays in maintaining cultural stereotypes. Finally, we outline potential avenues for future research.
AB - Backlash effects are defined as social and economic reprisals for behaving counterstereotypically (Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645). The present chapter outlines an impression-management dilemma that women face and describes the literature on backlash effects in organizations. Because women are perceived to be less competent, ambitious, and competitive (i.e., less agentic) than men, they may be overlooked for leadership positions unless they present themselves as atypical women. However, the prescriptive nature of gender stereotypes can result in negative reactions to female agency and authority (i.e., backlash). This dilemma has serious consequences for gender parity, as it undermines women at every stage of their careers. It also has consequences for organizations, as it likely contributes to female managers' higher rates of job disaffection and turnover, relative to male counterparts. In addition to specifying the consequences of backlash for women and organizations, we consider potential moderators of backlash effects and the role that backlash plays in maintaining cultural stereotypes. Finally, we outline potential avenues for future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46949111530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46949111530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
DO - 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:46949111530
SN - 0191-3085
VL - 28
SP - 61
EP - 79
JO - Research in Organizational Behavior
JF - Research in Organizational Behavior
ER -