Better to Stay Home: Evaluating the Impact of Day Reporting Centers on Offending

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a quasi-experimental evaluation of community resource centers (CRCs)—nonresidential, day reporting centers employed for recent parolees. CRC participants (n = 2,789), drawn from release cohorts in 2008, 2009, and 2010, were matched using propensity scores to similar parolees who did not participate in CRC programming (n = 16,500). At the conclusion of the scoring and matching process, 2,789 CRC–parolee pairs were identified, including the full population of program participants. Outcome measures, including rearrest, reconviction, and parole revocation rates, after 1, 2, and 3 years are reported. Across all release cohorts, CRC participants were arrested and revoked at significantly higher rates, resulting in higher rates of returns to custody. Implications for correctional policy are considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-121
Number of pages28
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Keywords

  • community corrections
  • community resource center
  • day reporting center
  • parole
  • propensity score matching
  • recidivism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Better to Stay Home: Evaluating the Impact of Day Reporting Centers on Offending'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this