Beyond Statistical Significance: A Holistic View of What Makes a Research Finding "Important"

  • Jane E. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Students often believe that statistical significance is the only determinant of whether a quantitative result is “important.” In this paper, I review traditional null hypothesis statistical testing to identify what questions inferential statistics can and cannot answer, including statistical significance, effect size and direction, causality, generalizability, and changeability of the independent variable. I illustrate these issues with examples from an empirical study of the association between how much time teenagers spent playing video games and time spent reading. I describe how study design and context determine each of those aspects of “importance,” and close by summarizing how to provide a holistic view of importance when writing about a quantitative analysis. I also include exercises to guide students through applying these concepts to articles in newspapers and scholarly journals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6
JournalNumeracy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Keywords

  • Causality
  • Confounding
  • Generalizability
  • Inferential statistics
  • Substantive significance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Statistical Significance: A Holistic View of What Makes a Research Finding "Important"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this