Abstract
In this article we build on an accompanying critique of recent writings international biodiversity conservation (this issue). Many scholars and observers are calling for stricter enforcement of protected area boundaries given the perceived failure of integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) and other people-oriented approaches to safeguard biodiversity. Pointing to many ongoing, field-based efforts, we argue that this resurgent focus on authoritarian protection practices largely overlooks key aspects of social and political process including clarification of moral standpoint, legitimacy, governance, accountability, learning, and nonlocal forces. Following a discussion of these six points, we offer a series of recommendations aimed at highlighting existing work and encouraging dialogue and constructive debate on the ways in which biodiversity protection interventions are carried out in developing countries.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-64 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Society and Natural Resources |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Development
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Accountability
- Biodiversity protection
- Community-based conservation
- Conservation and development
- Governance
- Learning
- Legitimacy
- Politics
- Protected area management