Brief report

Acceptance of behavioral interventions for children with cancer: Perceptions of parents, nurses, and community controls

Deborah L. Miller, Sharon Manne, Sheila Palevsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the treatment acceptability of behavioral interventions targeting noncompliance in children with cancer, in medical versus general situations. Methods: Participants included 40 parents of children on active medical treatment for cancer, 42 pediatric oncology nurses, and 34 parents of medically healthy children. After reading a clinical vignette, participants rated the acceptability of five behavioral interventions via the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Results: Positive reinforcement, response cost, and reprimand generally were perceived as moderately acceptable. Overcorrection was perceived as unacceptable by all groups. Compared with nurses and parents of medically well children, parents of children with cancer provided significantly lower acceptability ratings for response cost and time-out, two of the punitive strategies studied. Conclusions: Results suggest that clinicians should assess the acceptability of specific treatments prior to intervening. Methods for enhancing acceptability should be explored in future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-271
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of pediatric psychology
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parents
Nurses
Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics
Reading
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{b3964037a9e84fb69ee0ac750d25429e,
title = "Brief report: Acceptance of behavioral interventions for children with cancer: Perceptions of parents, nurses, and community controls",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the treatment acceptability of behavioral interventions targeting noncompliance in children with cancer, in medical versus general situations. Methods: Participants included 40 parents of children on active medical treatment for cancer, 42 pediatric oncology nurses, and 34 parents of medically healthy children. After reading a clinical vignette, participants rated the acceptability of five behavioral interventions via the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Results: Positive reinforcement, response cost, and reprimand generally were perceived as moderately acceptable. Overcorrection was perceived as unacceptable by all groups. Compared with nurses and parents of medically well children, parents of children with cancer provided significantly lower acceptability ratings for response cost and time-out, two of the punitive strategies studied. Conclusions: Results suggest that clinicians should assess the acceptability of specific treatments prior to intervening. Methods for enhancing acceptability should be explored in future research.",
author = "Miller, {Deborah L.} and Sharon Manne and Sheila Palevsky",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jpepsy/23.4.267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "267--271",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Psychology",
issn = "0146-8693",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Brief report : Acceptance of behavioral interventions for children with cancer: Perceptions of parents, nurses, and community controls. / Miller, Deborah L.; Manne, Sharon; Palevsky, Sheila.

In: Journal of pediatric psychology, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.08.1998, p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief report

T2 - Acceptance of behavioral interventions for children with cancer: Perceptions of parents, nurses, and community controls

AU - Miller, Deborah L.

AU - Manne, Sharon

AU - Palevsky, Sheila

PY - 1998/8/1

Y1 - 1998/8/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the treatment acceptability of behavioral interventions targeting noncompliance in children with cancer, in medical versus general situations. Methods: Participants included 40 parents of children on active medical treatment for cancer, 42 pediatric oncology nurses, and 34 parents of medically healthy children. After reading a clinical vignette, participants rated the acceptability of five behavioral interventions via the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Results: Positive reinforcement, response cost, and reprimand generally were perceived as moderately acceptable. Overcorrection was perceived as unacceptable by all groups. Compared with nurses and parents of medically well children, parents of children with cancer provided significantly lower acceptability ratings for response cost and time-out, two of the punitive strategies studied. Conclusions: Results suggest that clinicians should assess the acceptability of specific treatments prior to intervening. Methods for enhancing acceptability should be explored in future research.

AB - Objective: To examine the treatment acceptability of behavioral interventions targeting noncompliance in children with cancer, in medical versus general situations. Methods: Participants included 40 parents of children on active medical treatment for cancer, 42 pediatric oncology nurses, and 34 parents of medically healthy children. After reading a clinical vignette, participants rated the acceptability of five behavioral interventions via the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Results: Positive reinforcement, response cost, and reprimand generally were perceived as moderately acceptable. Overcorrection was perceived as unacceptable by all groups. Compared with nurses and parents of medically well children, parents of children with cancer provided significantly lower acceptability ratings for response cost and time-out, two of the punitive strategies studied. Conclusions: Results suggest that clinicians should assess the acceptability of specific treatments prior to intervening. Methods for enhancing acceptability should be explored in future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031844649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031844649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/23.4.267

DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/23.4.267

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 267

EP - 271

JO - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

SN - 0146-8693

IS - 4

ER -