Calibration of atmospheric density model based on Gaussian Processes

Tianyu Gao, Hao Peng, Xiaoli Bai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Neutral mass density is presently the predominant uncertain term among all the factors affecting the atmospheric drag, which is the dominant perturbation force for space objects at low altitude. The current best density estimation performance is often achieved by empirical models that can be limited by their assumed, parametric formulations of regression. This paper presents a density estimation framework that integrates information from empirical models, environment conditions, and satellite measurement data. Different from existing frameworks, the new integration mechanism is based on Gaussian Processes (GPs) which are nonlinear, non-parametric regression methods. The method can estimate both current and future densities. Furthermore, it will provide uncertainty quantifications in its estimates through GPs' underlying Bayesian inference. Simulations are designed to test the hypothesis that the new framework is valuable to improve the nowcast performance of the empirical models, and to predict future density. Empirical models including NRLMSISE-00 and JB2008 and accelerometer-inferred densities from satellite CHAMP are used for the study. The new method is shown to achieve better Pearson correlation coefficient (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean ratio from the empirical models when the density estimation is tested on both the missing data and future densities, which are, respectively, within and following the GP's training period. Together with providing quality uncertainty estimations, the proposed framework has the great potential to reduce the estimation errors from the empirical model and provide an effective means to estimate density for a satellite.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-281
Number of pages9
JournalActa Astronautica
Volume168
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Atmospheric density
Calibration
Satellites
Accelerometers
Density (specific gravity)
Error analysis
Drag
Current density

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Keywords

  • Gaussian process
  • Thermospheric density

Cite this

@article{a99b517bef034be086283a052c1813c4,
title = "Calibration of atmospheric density model based on Gaussian Processes",
abstract = "Neutral mass density is presently the predominant uncertain term among all the factors affecting the atmospheric drag, which is the dominant perturbation force for space objects at low altitude. The current best density estimation performance is often achieved by empirical models that can be limited by their assumed, parametric formulations of regression. This paper presents a density estimation framework that integrates information from empirical models, environment conditions, and satellite measurement data. Different from existing frameworks, the new integration mechanism is based on Gaussian Processes (GPs) which are nonlinear, non-parametric regression methods. The method can estimate both current and future densities. Furthermore, it will provide uncertainty quantifications in its estimates through GPs' underlying Bayesian inference. Simulations are designed to test the hypothesis that the new framework is valuable to improve the nowcast performance of the empirical models, and to predict future density. Empirical models including NRLMSISE-00 and JB2008 and accelerometer-inferred densities from satellite CHAMP are used for the study. The new method is shown to achieve better Pearson correlation coefficient (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean ratio from the empirical models when the density estimation is tested on both the missing data and future densities, which are, respectively, within and following the GP's training period. Together with providing quality uncertainty estimations, the proposed framework has the great potential to reduce the estimation errors from the empirical model and provide an effective means to estimate density for a satellite.",
keywords = "Gaussian process, Thermospheric density",
author = "Tianyu Gao and Hao Peng and Xiaoli Bai",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "273--281",
journal = "Acta Astronautica",
issn = "0094-5765",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Calibration of atmospheric density model based on Gaussian Processes. / Gao, Tianyu; Peng, Hao; Bai, Xiaoli.

In: Acta Astronautica, Vol. 168, 03.2020, p. 273-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calibration of atmospheric density model based on Gaussian Processes

AU - Gao, Tianyu

AU - Peng, Hao

AU - Bai, Xiaoli

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Neutral mass density is presently the predominant uncertain term among all the factors affecting the atmospheric drag, which is the dominant perturbation force for space objects at low altitude. The current best density estimation performance is often achieved by empirical models that can be limited by their assumed, parametric formulations of regression. This paper presents a density estimation framework that integrates information from empirical models, environment conditions, and satellite measurement data. Different from existing frameworks, the new integration mechanism is based on Gaussian Processes (GPs) which are nonlinear, non-parametric regression methods. The method can estimate both current and future densities. Furthermore, it will provide uncertainty quantifications in its estimates through GPs' underlying Bayesian inference. Simulations are designed to test the hypothesis that the new framework is valuable to improve the nowcast performance of the empirical models, and to predict future density. Empirical models including NRLMSISE-00 and JB2008 and accelerometer-inferred densities from satellite CHAMP are used for the study. The new method is shown to achieve better Pearson correlation coefficient (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean ratio from the empirical models when the density estimation is tested on both the missing data and future densities, which are, respectively, within and following the GP's training period. Together with providing quality uncertainty estimations, the proposed framework has the great potential to reduce the estimation errors from the empirical model and provide an effective means to estimate density for a satellite.

AB - Neutral mass density is presently the predominant uncertain term among all the factors affecting the atmospheric drag, which is the dominant perturbation force for space objects at low altitude. The current best density estimation performance is often achieved by empirical models that can be limited by their assumed, parametric formulations of regression. This paper presents a density estimation framework that integrates information from empirical models, environment conditions, and satellite measurement data. Different from existing frameworks, the new integration mechanism is based on Gaussian Processes (GPs) which are nonlinear, non-parametric regression methods. The method can estimate both current and future densities. Furthermore, it will provide uncertainty quantifications in its estimates through GPs' underlying Bayesian inference. Simulations are designed to test the hypothesis that the new framework is valuable to improve the nowcast performance of the empirical models, and to predict future density. Empirical models including NRLMSISE-00 and JB2008 and accelerometer-inferred densities from satellite CHAMP are used for the study. The new method is shown to achieve better Pearson correlation coefficient (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean ratio from the empirical models when the density estimation is tested on both the missing data and future densities, which are, respectively, within and following the GP's training period. Together with providing quality uncertainty estimations, the proposed framework has the great potential to reduce the estimation errors from the empirical model and provide an effective means to estimate density for a satellite.

KW - Gaussian process

KW - Thermospheric density

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077388764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077388764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.12.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077388764

VL - 168

SP - 273

EP - 281

JO - Acta Astronautica

JF - Acta Astronautica

SN - 0094-5765

ER -