TY - JOUR
T1 - Case study
T2 - Protection of environmental resources through the implementation of optimum feed-management practices on equine farms
AU - Westendorf, M. L.
AU - Williams, C. W.
AU - Kenny, L. B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by a USDA-Natural Resources Conserva tion Service Conservation Innova tion Grant from 2009 to 2013. The goals of this project were to develop a methodology for implementing the 592 Conservation Practice Standard for Feed Management (USDA-NRCS, 2011b) for New Jersey equine producers, report on feed-management practices from the participating farms, use participating farms as demonstration farms in 2 New Jersey watersheds (Salem River and South Branch Raritan), and conduct an educational program to educate the public about environmentally friendly feed-management practices. The project consisted of the following: producer selection and assessment, pasture evaluation, feed and forage testing, feed-management consultations and plan development, and evaluation of the program. According to the New Jersey USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service (personal communication, 2012), the South Branch Raritan (NJ) region has 4,208 horses on 406 ha (stocking density of 10.5 per hectare; range 1.75 to 67.5 per hectare) and the Salem River (SJ) region has 2,085 horses on 171 ha (stocking density of 12.3 per hectare; range 1 to 145 per hectare).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - The goal of this project was to develop an equine feed-management program similar to the national program (Harrison et al., 2012) that implements the USDA Standard for Feed Management. Twenty-one cooperating farms in 2 separate watersheds served as demonstration sites for proper feed-management practices. Most had no understanding of environmentally friendly feeding practices or nutrient management. Hay and pasture were the primary forages fed, and bagged commercial feed plus bulk or whole grains were the primary concentrates. Several fed rice or wheat bran, beet pulp, oil, or flax seed; 14 of the farms fed at least one miscellaneous supplement (vitamin, mineral, joint, hoof, and so on). Most balanced diets on their own, 2 used a private consultant, 2 used a feed dealer, and none used extension services. Horses on farms began the project slightly overweight, averaging a BCS of 5.8 ± 0.1 on a scale of 1 to 9; there was little change (6.1 ± 0.1) over the course of the study. Most farms were overfeeding, perhaps creating increased nutrient losses. In general few participants implemented project recommendations (6 farms), and fewer followed up during the year (3 farms). Those following recommendations saw changes in the conditions of horses. Outcomes suggest that an equine feed-management program should include regular feed and forage testing, use of nutrition professionals to analyze animals and formulate diets, a pasture-management program, and a dry-lot or exercise-lot strategy to reduce feed losses. Equine farms present challenges when developing feed-management plans and may require alternative approaches to encourage producer participation.
AB - The goal of this project was to develop an equine feed-management program similar to the national program (Harrison et al., 2012) that implements the USDA Standard for Feed Management. Twenty-one cooperating farms in 2 separate watersheds served as demonstration sites for proper feed-management practices. Most had no understanding of environmentally friendly feeding practices or nutrient management. Hay and pasture were the primary forages fed, and bagged commercial feed plus bulk or whole grains were the primary concentrates. Several fed rice or wheat bran, beet pulp, oil, or flax seed; 14 of the farms fed at least one miscellaneous supplement (vitamin, mineral, joint, hoof, and so on). Most balanced diets on their own, 2 used a private consultant, 2 used a feed dealer, and none used extension services. Horses on farms began the project slightly overweight, averaging a BCS of 5.8 ± 0.1 on a scale of 1 to 9; there was little change (6.1 ± 0.1) over the course of the study. Most farms were overfeeding, perhaps creating increased nutrient losses. In general few participants implemented project recommendations (6 farms), and fewer followed up during the year (3 farms). Those following recommendations saw changes in the conditions of horses. Outcomes suggest that an equine feed-management program should include regular feed and forage testing, use of nutrition professionals to analyze animals and formulate diets, a pasture-management program, and a dry-lot or exercise-lot strategy to reduce feed losses. Equine farms present challenges when developing feed-management plans and may require alternative approaches to encourage producer participation.
KW - Best management practices
KW - Equine
KW - Feed management
KW - Nutrient management
KW - Waste disposal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957586873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957586873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/pas.2014-01379
DO - 10.15232/pas.2014-01379
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957586873
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 31
SP - 296
EP - 301
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 3
ER -