Abstract
Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are changing the management of invasive infections due to carbapenem- resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), leading to higher rates of clinical cure, decreased mortality, and decreased rates of acute kidney injury compared with colistin-based regimens. However, these 2 agents are not interchangeable with regard to management of CRE infections, and clinicians need to be aware of their differences. This review focuses on differences in the in vitro activity of these agents as a function of mechanism of carbapenem resistance, the clinical data supporting their superiority over colistin-based therapy, and the differences between agents with regard to propensity for selection of resistance. Furthermore, considerations and recommendations for hospital formularies and antibiotic stewardship programs regarding positioning of these agents are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 519-524 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Clinical Infectious Diseases |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 18 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
Keywords
- Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase
- antimicrobial stewardship.
- carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
- ceftazidime/avibactam
- meropenem/vaborbactam