TY - JOUR
T1 - Centering context when characterizing food environments
T2 - the potential of participatory mapping to inform food environment research
AU - Downs, Shauna
AU - Manohar, Swetha
AU - Staromiejska, Wiktoria
AU - Keo, Chanvuthy
AU - Say, Sophea
AU - Chhinh, Nyda
AU - Fanzo, Jessica
AU - Sok, Serey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Downs, Manohar, Staromiejska, Keo, Say, Chhinh, Fanzo and Sok.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Food environments are a critical place within the food system to implement interventions aimed at enabling sustainable diets. In this perspective article, we argue for the need for food environment research to more comprehensively examine the different types of food environments that people access within their communities to ensure that interventions and programs are better aligned with people’s lived experiences. We highlight the potential ways in which participatory mapping (PM) can be leveraged to better design food environment research by: (1) identifying the different food environment types that are accessed within a given community; (2) providing insight into the timing for data collection; (3) informing the prioritization of where to conduct food environment assessments; and (4) highlighting the dynamism of food environments over time (e.g., across a given day or across seasons). We provide a case study example of the application of PM and the lessons learned from it in Cambodia. By conceptualizing food environments in a more comprehensive way, from the perspective of the people living within a given community, we will be able to measure food environments in a way that more closely aligns with people’s lived experiences.
AB - Food environments are a critical place within the food system to implement interventions aimed at enabling sustainable diets. In this perspective article, we argue for the need for food environment research to more comprehensively examine the different types of food environments that people access within their communities to ensure that interventions and programs are better aligned with people’s lived experiences. We highlight the potential ways in which participatory mapping (PM) can be leveraged to better design food environment research by: (1) identifying the different food environment types that are accessed within a given community; (2) providing insight into the timing for data collection; (3) informing the prioritization of where to conduct food environment assessments; and (4) highlighting the dynamism of food environments over time (e.g., across a given day or across seasons). We provide a case study example of the application of PM and the lessons learned from it in Cambodia. By conceptualizing food environments in a more comprehensive way, from the perspective of the people living within a given community, we will be able to measure food environments in a way that more closely aligns with people’s lived experiences.
KW - Mekong River
KW - Tonle sap lake
KW - focus group discussion
KW - food environment
KW - participatory mapping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186950418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186950418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnut.2024.1324102
DO - 10.3389/fnut.2024.1324102
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85186950418
SN - 2296-861X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Nutrition
JF - Frontiers in Nutrition
M1 - 1324102
ER -