Abstract
After the Multi-Fiber Agreement ended in 2005, most Asian-owned subsidiaries exited the Mauritius export processing zone (MEPZ), while most European-owned subsidiaries and domestic firms remained and further integrated their presence in the MEPZ. Based on the heterogeneity of their strategic response to changes in trade policies, we hypothesize that Asian-owned subsidiaries did not, during their operating life-time in the MEPZ, actively engage in creating technological capabilities when compared to their European-owned and domestic counterparts. Our results support our hypothesis and we discuss their serious implications for other Sub-Saharan African textile-based EPZs in connection to the African Growth and Opportunity Act.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 469-485 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | World Development |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Building and Construction
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- AGOA
- Domestic firms
- Foreign subsidiaries
- Mauritius
- Technological capabilities
- Textile industry