Clarifying managerial biases using a probabilistic framework

Polina Ellina, Briance Mascarenhas, Panayiotis Theodossiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

A unifying probabilistic framework is developed to analyze and compare the impact of the psychological biases of overconfidence and underconfidence on managerial perceptions about the expected value, overall risk, downside risk, value-at-risk and expected shortfall of decision-making economic variables. The results depict that overconfident managers overestimate their expected values and underestimate downside risk, VaR and ES of decision-making variables. Underconfident managers, on the other hand, underestimate their expected values and overestimate downside risk, value-at-risk, and expected shortfall.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100333
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Volume27
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance

Keywords

  • Downside risk
  • Expected shortfall
  • Probability miscalibration
  • Psychological biases
  • Skewed normal distribution
  • Value-at-risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clarifying managerial biases using a probabilistic framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this