Abstract
A number of studies have shown that seemingly morally irrelevant factors influence the moral judgments of ordinary people. Some argue that philosophers are experts and are significantly less susceptible to such effects. We tested whether an unconscious cleanliness prime - the smell of Lysol - affects the judgments of both nonphilosophers and professional philosophers. Our results suggest that the direction of cleanliness effects depends both on the respondent and whether the question is framed in the second or third person. They also provide evidence that cleanliness cues affect the moral judgments of both non-philosophers and philosophers, challenging the philosopher- as-expert view.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 195-204 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Consciousness Studies |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 11-12 |
State | Published - 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Philosophy
- Psychology (miscellaneous)
- Artificial Intelligence