TY - JOUR
T1 - Close, but no cigar
T2 - Certain cigars are pseudo-cigarettes designed to evade regulation
AU - Delnevo, Cristine D.
AU - Hrywna, Mary
AU - Giovenco, Daniel P.
AU - Lo, Erin J.Miller
AU - O’Connor, Richard J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by grants from the NIHNational Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (3P30CA072720-17S1; R03CA119799;P30CA016056).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - An abundance of evidence suggests that the tobacco industry’s response to increased regulation imposed on cigarettes has been the development of little cigars and filtered cigars which are tobacco products that are merely cigarettes in disguise. Emphasising these products’ physical attributes, the tobacco industry has offered cigar products to its consumers as pseudocigarettes. For decades, tobacco manufacturers’ response to increased cigarette regulation and taxation has been to exploit policy loopholes by offering these little cigars and filtered cigars pseudo-cigarettes that are exempted from this regulatory oversight. As a result, in spite of increased regulations and taxes on cigarettes, smokers can purchase cigars that are almost physically indistinguishable from their cigarettes at a lower cost. This commentary describes the recent evolution of the cigar market in response to federal regulation, and highlights historical cigar industry attempts to evade taxation, capitalise on product features that are off-limits to cigarettes, and capture the shrinking market of cigarette smokers. We present the case that little cigars and filtered cigars, differing very little physically from cigarettes, are products deserving the same regulatory scrutiny.
AB - An abundance of evidence suggests that the tobacco industry’s response to increased regulation imposed on cigarettes has been the development of little cigars and filtered cigars which are tobacco products that are merely cigarettes in disguise. Emphasising these products’ physical attributes, the tobacco industry has offered cigar products to its consumers as pseudocigarettes. For decades, tobacco manufacturers’ response to increased cigarette regulation and taxation has been to exploit policy loopholes by offering these little cigars and filtered cigars pseudo-cigarettes that are exempted from this regulatory oversight. As a result, in spite of increased regulations and taxes on cigarettes, smokers can purchase cigars that are almost physically indistinguishable from their cigarettes at a lower cost. This commentary describes the recent evolution of the cigar market in response to federal regulation, and highlights historical cigar industry attempts to evade taxation, capitalise on product features that are off-limits to cigarettes, and capture the shrinking market of cigarette smokers. We present the case that little cigars and filtered cigars, differing very little physically from cigarettes, are products deserving the same regulatory scrutiny.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973327582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973327582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052935
DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052935
M3 - Article
C2 - 27220622
AN - SCOPUS:84973327582
VL - 26
SP - 349
EP - 354
JO - Tobacco Control
JF - Tobacco Control
SN - 0964-4563
IS - 3
ER -