Cognition and behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations


An important question in the debate over embodied, enactive, and extended cognition has been what has been meant by “cognition”. What is this cognition that is supposed to be embodied, enactive, or extended? Rather than undertake a frontal assault on this question, however, this paper will take a different approach. In particular, we may ask how cognition is supposed to be related to behavior. First, we could ask whether cognition is supposed to be (a type of) behavior. Second, we could ask whether we should attempt to understand cognitive processes in terms of antecedently understood cognitive behaviors. This paper will survey some of the answers that have been (implicitly or explicitly) given in the embodied, enactive, and extended cognition literature, then suggest reasons to believe that we should answer both questions in the negative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4269-4288
Number of pages20
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)


  • Behavior
  • Cognition
  • Embodied cognition
  • Enactivism
  • Extended cognition


Dive into the research topics of 'Cognition and behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this