Cohen on ‘Epistemic’

Matthew McGrath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stewart Cohen offers a critique of much contemporary epistemology. Epistemologies use the term ‘epistemic’ in order to specify the issues they investigate and about which they disagree. Cohen sees widespread confusion about these issues. The problem, he argues, is that ‘epistemic’ is functioning as an inadequately defined technical term. I will argue, rather, that the troubles come more from non-technical vocabulary, in particular with ‘justification’ and ‘ought’, and generally from the difficulty of explaining normativity. Overall, the message of this paper is that normativity is what’s hard to understand, not the term ‘epistemic.’

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)889-905
Number of pages17
JournalInquiry (United Kingdom)
Volume59
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 16 2016
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Keywords

  • epistemic justification
  • epistemic norms
  • internalism and externalism
  • knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cohen on ‘Epistemic’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this