Communist legacies and new trajectories: Democracy and dictatorship in the former Soviet Union and East Central Europe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

For much of the 1990s the post-communist states fell into three geographically clustered groups of distinct types of regimes: market-oriented democracies in East Central Europe, dictatorships predominately in Central Asia, and parasitic authoritarian regimes in the vast area between East Central Europe and Central Asia. That third group may now be fracturing, with some middle-of-the-road authoritarianisms moving toward democracy and some toward dictatorship. This change of trajectory and the concomitant emergence of two camps are, like the emergence and persistence of the three clusters, for the most part the product of systemic forces inherited from the communist past. If so, overcoming these divisions will not be easy. Only a patient and steadfast commitment to targeted institutional change on the part of these countries and of the West – the United States and the European Union (EU) – may decelerate, deflect, or reverse the trend toward two camps in the medium to long term. Whether such a commitment is likely in the aftermath of EU enlargement and the U.S.-led war on terrorism is, unfortunately, far from certain. Table 1 groups the post-communist states according to their cumulative scores for a variety of indicators – relating to democracy, the market, rule of law, and civil society – compiled and published by the U.S.-based Freedom House (in its reports on Nations in Transit).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRestructuring Post-Communist Russia
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages52-67
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780511509995
ISBN (Print)0521840279, 9780521840279
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

East Central Europe
dictatorship
USSR
Central Asia
democracy
Types of Groups
regime
commitment
market
institutional change
constitutional state
persistence
civil society
terrorism
Group
road
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@inbook{118d5ebe61aa405a915cf368c5feb555,
title = "Communist legacies and new trajectories: Democracy and dictatorship in the former Soviet Union and East Central Europe",
abstract = "For much of the 1990s the post-communist states fell into three geographically clustered groups of distinct types of regimes: market-oriented democracies in East Central Europe, dictatorships predominately in Central Asia, and parasitic authoritarian regimes in the vast area between East Central Europe and Central Asia. That third group may now be fracturing, with some middle-of-the-road authoritarianisms moving toward democracy and some toward dictatorship. This change of trajectory and the concomitant emergence of two camps are, like the emergence and persistence of the three clusters, for the most part the product of systemic forces inherited from the communist past. If so, overcoming these divisions will not be easy. Only a patient and steadfast commitment to targeted institutional change on the part of these countries and of the West – the United States and the European Union (EU) – may decelerate, deflect, or reverse the trend toward two camps in the medium to long term. Whether such a commitment is likely in the aftermath of EU enlargement and the U.S.-led war on terrorism is, unfortunately, far from certain. Table 1 groups the post-communist states according to their cumulative scores for a variety of indicators – relating to democracy, the market, rule of law, and civil society – compiled and published by the U.S.-based Freedom House (in its reports on Nations in Transit).",
author = "Motyl, {Alexander J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511509995.005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0521840279",
pages = "52--67",
booktitle = "Restructuring Post-Communist Russia",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Communist legacies and new trajectories : Democracy and dictatorship in the former Soviet Union and East Central Europe. / Motyl, Alexander J.

Restructuring Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 52-67.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Communist legacies and new trajectories

T2 - Democracy and dictatorship in the former Soviet Union and East Central Europe

AU - Motyl, Alexander J.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - For much of the 1990s the post-communist states fell into three geographically clustered groups of distinct types of regimes: market-oriented democracies in East Central Europe, dictatorships predominately in Central Asia, and parasitic authoritarian regimes in the vast area between East Central Europe and Central Asia. That third group may now be fracturing, with some middle-of-the-road authoritarianisms moving toward democracy and some toward dictatorship. This change of trajectory and the concomitant emergence of two camps are, like the emergence and persistence of the three clusters, for the most part the product of systemic forces inherited from the communist past. If so, overcoming these divisions will not be easy. Only a patient and steadfast commitment to targeted institutional change on the part of these countries and of the West – the United States and the European Union (EU) – may decelerate, deflect, or reverse the trend toward two camps in the medium to long term. Whether such a commitment is likely in the aftermath of EU enlargement and the U.S.-led war on terrorism is, unfortunately, far from certain. Table 1 groups the post-communist states according to their cumulative scores for a variety of indicators – relating to democracy, the market, rule of law, and civil society – compiled and published by the U.S.-based Freedom House (in its reports on Nations in Transit).

AB - For much of the 1990s the post-communist states fell into three geographically clustered groups of distinct types of regimes: market-oriented democracies in East Central Europe, dictatorships predominately in Central Asia, and parasitic authoritarian regimes in the vast area between East Central Europe and Central Asia. That third group may now be fracturing, with some middle-of-the-road authoritarianisms moving toward democracy and some toward dictatorship. This change of trajectory and the concomitant emergence of two camps are, like the emergence and persistence of the three clusters, for the most part the product of systemic forces inherited from the communist past. If so, overcoming these divisions will not be easy. Only a patient and steadfast commitment to targeted institutional change on the part of these countries and of the West – the United States and the European Union (EU) – may decelerate, deflect, or reverse the trend toward two camps in the medium to long term. Whether such a commitment is likely in the aftermath of EU enlargement and the U.S.-led war on terrorism is, unfortunately, far from certain. Table 1 groups the post-communist states according to their cumulative scores for a variety of indicators – relating to democracy, the market, rule of law, and civil society – compiled and published by the U.S.-based Freedom House (in its reports on Nations in Transit).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70450141991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70450141991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511509995.005

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511509995.005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:70450141991

SN - 0521840279

SN - 9780521840279

SP - 52

EP - 67

BT - Restructuring Post-Communist Russia

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -