TY - JOUR
T1 - Community engagement to address cancer health disparities
T2 - A process evaluation using the partnership self-assessment tool
AU - Brown, Qiana L.
AU - Elmi, Ahmed
AU - Bone, Lee
AU - Stillman, Frances
AU - Mbah, Olive
AU - Bowie, Janice V.
AU - Wenzel, Jennifer
AU - Gray, Alexandra
AU - Ford, Jean G.
AU - Slade, Jimmie L.
AU - Dobs, Adrian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Background: African Americans suffer disproportionately from cancer health disparities, and population-level prevention is needed. Objectives: A community–academic partnership to address cancer health disparities in two predominately African American jurisdictions in Maryland was evaluated. Methods: The Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) was used in a process evaluation to assess the partnership in eight domains (partnership synergy, leadership, efficiency, management, resources, decision making, participation, and satisfaction). Results: Mean scores in each domain were high, indicative of a functional and synergistic partnership. However, scores for decision making (Baltimore City’s mean score = 9.3; Prince George’s County’s mean score = 10.8; p = .02) and participation (Baltimore City’s mean score = 16.0; Prince George’s County’s mean score = 18.0; p = .04) were significantly lower in Baltimore City. Conclusions: Community–academic partnerships are promising approaches to help address cancer health disparities in African American communities. Factors that influence decision making and participation within partnerships require further research.
AB - Background: African Americans suffer disproportionately from cancer health disparities, and population-level prevention is needed. Objectives: A community–academic partnership to address cancer health disparities in two predominately African American jurisdictions in Maryland was evaluated. Methods: The Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) was used in a process evaluation to assess the partnership in eight domains (partnership synergy, leadership, efficiency, management, resources, decision making, participation, and satisfaction). Results: Mean scores in each domain were high, indicative of a functional and synergistic partnership. However, scores for decision making (Baltimore City’s mean score = 9.3; Prince George’s County’s mean score = 10.8; p = .02) and participation (Baltimore City’s mean score = 16.0; Prince George’s County’s mean score = 18.0; p = .04) were significantly lower in Baltimore City. Conclusions: Community–academic partnerships are promising approaches to help address cancer health disparities in African American communities. Factors that influence decision making and participation within partnerships require further research.
KW - CBPR
KW - Cancer
KW - Community advisory groups
KW - Partnership Self-Assessment Tool
KW - Process evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064476736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064476736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0012
DO - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0012
M3 - Article
C2 - 30956251
AN - SCOPUS:85064476736
SN - 1557-0541
VL - 13
SP - 97
EP - 104
JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
IS - 1
ER -