Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy

Tobias Gerhard, Joseph A.C. Delaney, Rhonda M. Cooper-Dehoff, Jonathan Shuster, Babette A. Brumback, Julie A. Johnson, Carl J. Pepine, Almut G. Winterstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Due to time-dependent confounding by blood pressure and differential loss to follow-up, it is difficult to estimate the effectiveness of aggressive versus conventional antihypertensive combination therapies in non-randomized comparisons. Methods. We utilized data from 22,576 hypertensive coronary artery disease patients, prospectively enrolled in the INternational VErapamil-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST). Our post-hoc analyses did not consider the randomized treatment strategies, but instead defined exposure time-dependently as aggressive treatment (≥3 concomitantly used antihypertensive medications) versus conventional treatment (≤2 concomitantly used antihypertensive medications). Study outcome was defined as time to first serious cardiovascular event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or all-cause death). We compared hazard ratio (HR) estimates for aggressive vs. conventional treatment from a Marginal Structural Cox Model (MSCM) to estimates from a standard Cox model. Both models included exposure to antihypertensive treatment at each follow-up visit, demographics, and baseline cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure. The MSCM further adjusted for systolic blood pressure at each follow-up visit, through inverse probability of treatment weights. Results: 2,269 (10.1%) patients experienced a cardiovascular event over a total follow-up of 60,939 person-years. The HR for aggressive treatment estimated by the standard Cox model was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.07). The equivalent MSCM, which was able to account for changes in systolic blood pressure during follow-up, estimated a HR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.92). Conclusions: Using a MSCM, aggressive treatment was associated with a lower risk for serious cardiovascular outcomes compared to conventional treatment. In contrast, a standard Cox model estimated similar risks for aggressive and conventional treatments. Trial registration. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133692.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number119
JournalBMC medical research methodology
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Keywords

  • Blood pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Marginal structural models
  • Time-dependent confounding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this