TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between Batch and Continuous Monoclonal Antibody Production and Economic Analysis
AU - Yang, Ou
AU - Prabhu, Siddharth
AU - Ierapetritou, Marianthi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from NSF, under Grant No. 1547171.
PY - 2019/4/17
Y1 - 2019/4/17
N2 - This work aims to evaluate the benefits of the continuous process in biopharmaceutical manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). An integrated continuous process is designed and built using a process simulator and compared with a fed-batch process production line. The comparisons are based on cost of goods (COG/g) calculation and sensitivity analysis. The fed-batch process results in operating COG/g of $99/g in mAbs production, whereas the continuous process accounts for $51/g. Because of the smaller footprint and fewer storage tanks required in the continuous process, the facility cost reduced by 66%, compared to the fed-batch process. In continuous production, there is a better utilization of the primary capture resin, which leads to a reduction in consumables cost by 68%. Sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate the process in different manufacturing scales (50-1200 kg/yr), upstream titers (1.5-5.5 g/L), and downstream yield (70%-80%). Cost savings can be observed through the entire range.
AB - This work aims to evaluate the benefits of the continuous process in biopharmaceutical manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). An integrated continuous process is designed and built using a process simulator and compared with a fed-batch process production line. The comparisons are based on cost of goods (COG/g) calculation and sensitivity analysis. The fed-batch process results in operating COG/g of $99/g in mAbs production, whereas the continuous process accounts for $51/g. Because of the smaller footprint and fewer storage tanks required in the continuous process, the facility cost reduced by 66%, compared to the fed-batch process. In continuous production, there is a better utilization of the primary capture resin, which leads to a reduction in consumables cost by 68%. Sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate the process in different manufacturing scales (50-1200 kg/yr), upstream titers (1.5-5.5 g/L), and downstream yield (70%-80%). Cost savings can be observed through the entire range.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062063803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062063803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04717
DO - 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04717
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062063803
SN - 0888-5885
VL - 58
SP - 5851
EP - 5863
JO - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
JF - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
IS - 15
ER -