Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations


Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool's strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-60
Number of pages16
JournalMedical Reference Services Quarterly
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Informatics
  • Library and Information Sciences


  • Bibliographic management software
  • Connotea
  • EndNote
  • EndNote Web
  • Mendeley Desktop
  • Mendeley Web
  • Zotero
  • bookmarking tools
  • citation generators
  • citation managers
  • reference management tools
  • reference managers
  • reference organizers
  • research tools


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this