TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids
T2 - Are most editing events dispensable?
AU - Corneille, S.
AU - Lutz, K.
AU - Maliga, P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Masahiro Sugiura for information on tobacco editing sites at the prepublication stage and Ralph Bock for technical advice. This research was supported by the Monsanto Company and Rutgers Special Project Grant No. 2-888198.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.
AB - The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.
KW - Chloroplast
KW - Maize
KW - RNA editing
KW - Rice
KW - Tobacco
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033736511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033736511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004380000295
DO - 10.1007/s004380000295
M3 - Article
C2 - 11129045
AN - SCOPUS:0033736511
SN - 1617-4615
VL - 264
SP - 419
EP - 424
JO - Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre
JF - Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre
IS - 4
ER -