TY - JOUR
T1 - Consumer Satisfaction in Long-Term Care
T2 - State Initiatives in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities
AU - Lowe, Timothy J.
AU - Lucas, Judith A.
AU - Castle, Nicholas G.
AU - Robinson, Joanne P.
AU - Crystal, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
Iowa’s program is funded through licensing fees, a research grant, and general revenue. The estimated per survey cost is $12 (A. Martin, personal communication, Iowa Division of Elder Affairs, June 13, 2001). In 2002, Iowa’s program was temporarily suspended, and Iowa is investigating some logistical problems with the data collection and reporting system.
Funding Information:
This research was made possible by financial and logistical assistance provided by the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, whose support and commitment to quality improvement we gratefully acknowledge; it also received support from AHRQ Grant P-20-HS11825 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and from the School of Social Work, Rutgers University. The conclusions and interpretations reflect those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring agencies.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - Purpose: We report the results of a survey of state initiatives that measure resident satisfaction in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, and we describe several model programs for legislators and public administrators contemplating the initiation of their own state programs. Design and Methods: Data on state initiatives and programs were collected during March and April 2000 through a mailed questionnaire and follow-up telephone interviews and were current as of September 2002. Results: Of the 50 states surveyed, 50 responses were received (response rate = 100%); 12 states (24%) reported the use of consumer satisfaction measures, and 7 (Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin) reported using resident satisfaction data within their consumer information systems for nursing homes or assisted living facilities. Additionally, 2 states (Iowa and Wisconsin) use resident satisfaction data for facility licensing and recertification. The design of the instruments and collection methods vary in these states, as do the reported response rates, per-resident cost, and the purpose for satisfaction data collection. Implications: State satisfaction efforts are in an early stage of development. Well-produced, easily understandable reports on nursing home and assisted living quality could provide information and guidance for patients and families contemplating the utilization of long-term care services. Dissemination of quality information may also facilitate sustained quality and efficiency improvements in long-term care facilities and thus enhance the quality of care for and quality of life of long-term care residents.
AB - Purpose: We report the results of a survey of state initiatives that measure resident satisfaction in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, and we describe several model programs for legislators and public administrators contemplating the initiation of their own state programs. Design and Methods: Data on state initiatives and programs were collected during March and April 2000 through a mailed questionnaire and follow-up telephone interviews and were current as of September 2002. Results: Of the 50 states surveyed, 50 responses were received (response rate = 100%); 12 states (24%) reported the use of consumer satisfaction measures, and 7 (Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin) reported using resident satisfaction data within their consumer information systems for nursing homes or assisted living facilities. Additionally, 2 states (Iowa and Wisconsin) use resident satisfaction data for facility licensing and recertification. The design of the instruments and collection methods vary in these states, as do the reported response rates, per-resident cost, and the purpose for satisfaction data collection. Implications: State satisfaction efforts are in an early stage of development. Well-produced, easily understandable reports on nursing home and assisted living quality could provide information and guidance for patients and families contemplating the utilization of long-term care services. Dissemination of quality information may also facilitate sustained quality and efficiency improvements in long-term care facilities and thus enhance the quality of care for and quality of life of long-term care residents.
KW - Consumer information
KW - Long-term care outcomes
KW - Nursing home quality
KW - Quality monitoring
KW - State policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347989528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347989528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/geront/43.6.883
DO - 10.1093/geront/43.6.883
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14704388
AN - SCOPUS:0347989528
VL - 43
SP - 883
EP - 896
JO - The Gerontologist
JF - The Gerontologist
SN - 0016-9013
IS - 6
ER -