Corrigendum: Bond Risk Premiums with Machine Learning

Daniele Bianchi; Matthias Büchner; Tobias Hoogteijling; Andrea Tamoni

doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa098

Corrigendum: Bond Risk Premiums with Machine Learning

Daniele Bianchi, Matthias Büchner, Tobias Hoogteijling, Andrea Tamoni

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this note we revisit the empirical results in Bianchi, Büchner, and Tamoni (2020) after correcting for using information not available at the time the forecast was made. Although we note a decrease in out-of-sample $R^2$, the revised analysis confirms that bond excess return predictability from neural networks remains statistically and economically significant.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1090-1103
Number of pages	14
Journal	Review of Financial Studies
Volume	34
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa098
State	Published - Feb 1 2021
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Accounting
Finance
Economics and Econometrics

Access to Document

10.1093/rfs/hhaa098

Cite this

@article{dac9030cf3924d8bbe04de3a2165c56d,

title = "Corrigendum: Bond Risk Premiums with Machine Learning",

abstract = "In this note we revisit the empirical results in Bianchi, B{\"u}chner, and Tamoni (2020) after correcting for using information not available at the time the forecast was made. Although we note a decrease in out-of-sample $R^2$, the revised analysis confirms that bond excess return predictability from neural networks remains statistically and economically significant.",

author = "Daniele Bianchi and Matthias B{\"u}chner and Tobias Hoogteijling and Andrea Tamoni",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/rfs/hhaa098",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "34",

pages = "1090--1103",

journal = "Review of Financial Studies",

issn = "0893-9454",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - Bond Risk Premiums with Machine Learning

AU - Bianchi, Daniele

AU - Büchner, Matthias

AU - Hoogteijling, Tobias

AU - Tamoni, Andrea

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - In this note we revisit the empirical results in Bianchi, Büchner, and Tamoni (2020) after correcting for using information not available at the time the forecast was made. Although we note a decrease in out-of-sample $R^2$, the revised analysis confirms that bond excess return predictability from neural networks remains statistically and economically significant.

AB - In this note we revisit the empirical results in Bianchi, Büchner, and Tamoni (2020) after correcting for using information not available at the time the forecast was made. Although we note a decrease in out-of-sample $R^2$, the revised analysis confirms that bond excess return predictability from neural networks remains statistically and economically significant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100721092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100721092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rfs/hhaa098

DO - 10.1093/rfs/hhaa098

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85100721092

VL - 34

SP - 1090

EP - 1103

JO - Review of Financial Studies

JF - Review of Financial Studies

SN - 0893-9454

IS - 2

ER -

Corrigendum: Bond Risk Premiums with Machine Learning

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this