TY - JOUR
T1 - Countdown to an impasse
T2 - Expertise and the mediation of inequality at Brazil’s Alcântara launch center
AU - Mitchell, Sean T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Helen Kellogg Institute. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - This paper examines the conflicts surrounding Brazil’s Alcântara spaceport through an ethnographic analysis of an important meeting, and it advances some arguments about the use of expertise in social conflict. Conceived at the end of Brazil’s 1964-1985 military regime, the spaceport has long been at the center of social conflict. Today it is utilized by Brazil’s civilian and military space programs, often at odds with each other. When the base was built, some 1,500 villagers were removed from their land; other villages surrounding the base have resisted expropriation, assisted by a wide network of allies. During decades of conflict, villagers have increasingly come to mobilize around a contemporary ethnoracial identity, quilombola (escaped-slave descendant), prompted in part by a clause in Brazil’s 1988 constitution that requires that the state grant land rights to quilombo-descended communities. I argue that: 1) participants in Alcântara’s conflicts often frame their arguments by placing boundaries around technical, natural, and social domains-that is, by making claims about ontology; 2) such framing privileges varied forms of expertise; and 3) examining deployments of expertise is important for understanding relations of inequality in situations where globally dispersed technologies are significant (everywhere) and, also, when ambiguous, group-specific rights are involved (such as those of the quilombolas). In my consideration of the ontological character of some political claims, I briefly consider the so-called ontological turn in anthropological theory in order to argue against the construal of social differences as ontological ones.
AB - This paper examines the conflicts surrounding Brazil’s Alcântara spaceport through an ethnographic analysis of an important meeting, and it advances some arguments about the use of expertise in social conflict. Conceived at the end of Brazil’s 1964-1985 military regime, the spaceport has long been at the center of social conflict. Today it is utilized by Brazil’s civilian and military space programs, often at odds with each other. When the base was built, some 1,500 villagers were removed from their land; other villages surrounding the base have resisted expropriation, assisted by a wide network of allies. During decades of conflict, villagers have increasingly come to mobilize around a contemporary ethnoracial identity, quilombola (escaped-slave descendant), prompted in part by a clause in Brazil’s 1988 constitution that requires that the state grant land rights to quilombo-descended communities. I argue that: 1) participants in Alcântara’s conflicts often frame their arguments by placing boundaries around technical, natural, and social domains-that is, by making claims about ontology; 2) such framing privileges varied forms of expertise; and 3) examining deployments of expertise is important for understanding relations of inequality in situations where globally dispersed technologies are significant (everywhere) and, also, when ambiguous, group-specific rights are involved (such as those of the quilombolas). In my consideration of the ontological character of some political claims, I briefly consider the so-called ontological turn in anthropological theory in order to argue against the construal of social differences as ontological ones.
KW - Brazil
KW - Ethnography
KW - Expertise
KW - Governance
KW - Inequality
KW - Race
KW - Technoscience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002131864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002131864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85002131864
VL - 2016
JO - Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies
JF - Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies
IS - 413
ER -