TY - CHAP
T1 - Critical race theory in the lis curriculum
AU - Gibson, Amelia
AU - Hughes-Hassell, Sandra
AU - Threats, Megan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Purpose – We examine the reading lists for required foundational library and information science (LIS) courses at the top 20 American Library Association-accredited LIS programs in North America; explore the extent to which critical race theory (CRT) and other critical literatures, methods, and approaches were engaged; and discuss the implications of the findings for LIS education.Methodological Approach – We conducted quantitative and qualitative content analyses of foundational required readings for the top 20 Master of Library Science/Master of Library and Information Science programs (as ranked by U.S. News & World Report). The sampling process was twofold. The initial sampling included development of the foundational course sample, and the secondary sampling included development of the sample of required readings. Findings – The vast majority of the required foundational courses examined provided students with little to no exposure to CRT or critical theory. Originality/Value – CRT and its related concepts provide a structural framework for preparing LIS students and graduates to recognize and address racism, to understand “how power and privilege shape LIS institutions and professional practice” (Cooke, Sweeney, & Noble, 2016, p. 107), and to embrace social justice as an LIS value. Incorporating CRT into existing courses is the first step in pushing the profession in this direction.
AB - Purpose – We examine the reading lists for required foundational library and information science (LIS) courses at the top 20 American Library Association-accredited LIS programs in North America; explore the extent to which critical race theory (CRT) and other critical literatures, methods, and approaches were engaged; and discuss the implications of the findings for LIS education.Methodological Approach – We conducted quantitative and qualitative content analyses of foundational required readings for the top 20 Master of Library Science/Master of Library and Information Science programs (as ranked by U.S. News & World Report). The sampling process was twofold. The initial sampling included development of the foundational course sample, and the secondary sampling included development of the sample of required readings. Findings – The vast majority of the required foundational courses examined provided students with little to no exposure to CRT or critical theory. Originality/Value – CRT and its related concepts provide a structural framework for preparing LIS students and graduates to recognize and address racism, to understand “how power and privilege shape LIS institutions and professional practice” (Cooke, Sweeney, & Noble, 2016, p. 107), and to embrace social justice as an LIS value. Incorporating CRT into existing courses is the first step in pushing the profession in this direction.
KW - Critical race theory
KW - Diversity
KW - Education
KW - Foundations
KW - Library and information science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065571161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065571161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B005
DO - 10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B005
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85065571161
T3 - Advances in Librarianship
SP - 49
EP - 70
BT - Advances in Librarianship
PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
ER -